Tuesday, May 22, 2012

The Extra "CA" in the Word "Camacho" Must be Silent in Pronunciation and Spelling for This Turd


Intelligent people could manipulate borderline stupid, brain dead people. These people could say the right thing... to cause these dummies to enthusiastically jump in and make posts driven by bias rather than logic.

Demand Studios Sucks Zombie Camacho, or Cacamacho to match his name to his lack of intelligence, is the ideal propaganda audience. Page1News reposted a section of one of my posts. She did it in a way that'd stir the DMS zombies into a frothing-at-the-mouth frenzy.

The media does this when they want people to think a certain way. This should be proof of Page1News' journalistic background, in case people had doubts.

The post that she selected for quoting, along with her comment, were designed to get people to react a specific way. It worked... with someone that's easily manipulated. Cacamacho fell for her trick; hook, line and sinker.

In Psychological Warfare/Operations, that's called being vulnerable/receptive to a PSYOP Objective. Cacamacho would have a high vulnerability to being manipulated into carrying out a desired course of action.

What if all the terrorists in the world all of a sudden gained Cacamacho's manipulate-able mindset? We'd conclude the War on Terrorism within a week via a global leaflet drop on their positions. No additional shots fired.

If I was a thief, and I ran into a neighborhood full of Cacamachos, I'd easily convince them to leave their doors open... to leave their dogs elsewhere... to not offer any resistance... and to deactivate their alarms... by simply posting posters -- with the right message -- throughout the neighborhood. Some of them would even give me friendly small talk as I walked out with their belongings.

What a retard... this DMS zombie Cacamacho...

"If he's not getting enough validation and attaboys for his efforts, he should hire a hooker to stroke his ego and other body parts." -- Cacamacho

You're either blind, stupid, or both... or you're another retard that can't understand English written so that a 5th grader would understand what's being said.

Did you not see the comment of the person that I replied to? You know, the part where she farts out of her arse about a "job" being a "foreign" concept to me? What you replied to, you retard, is a rebuttal proving her insinuation wrong with first hand facts. She attacked me, and I fired back.

What I've repeatedly said:

"Other than my first post, the rest of my replies were reactive. They were dependent on what the opposition said." -- Writer Cubed

If you didn't know that, you shouldn't take part in this exchange... unless you don't mind sounding like an uneducated turd that's jumping onto the bandwagon. The fact that you'd ignore the "X" in the "If X, then Y," cause and effect relationship, destroys any credibility you'd have with this subject.

"Prostituting is a veritable job that requires peak physical condition and constant exposure to danger, so I'm sure his temporary lady friend will be happy to commiserate. Oh, but prostitutes don't get body armor, weapons, training, housing and government pensions." -- CACAmacho

Shame on you for denigrating military service... in a month containing Armed Forces Week, Armed Forces Day, and Memorial Day... to being something equivalent to what hookers do.

Your assumption is wrong, and reflects ignorance of both military and sex worker life. Do a simple Google search on prostitutes, independent escorts, hookers, etc. If what you said were true, every single picture that's shown for the escort, on the escort webpage brought up, would show a woman that's in peak physical condition.

Anybody with eyeballs, and common sense, would see that many of the slightly overweight, and overweight, independent providers, hookers, street walkers, etc, aren't in peak physical condition.

Although they're exposed to dangers, it's a danger that they can significantly mitigate... IE, they could refuse to see someone that fails their verification and vetting process.

Shame on you for even suggesting that these women face something comparable to what service members face downrange... thus putting them on equal footing when it comes to dangers faced.

We don't have the convenience of controlling who comes into the combat theater to pose a threat to us. Unlike those women, we can't just "remove" ourselves from the environment. That's a lot of mileage whether you travel by foot, or by air.

Prostitutes have the convenience of removing themselves from their environment... as well as the dangers they face... Talk to the women of "HIPS," if you think otherwise. We don't have that convenience downrange... so this isn't even close to being a comparison.

The level of danger is far higher for a combat Soldier downrange, than it is for a prostitute on US soil you dumbass. Hence, they don't need body armor to do their jobs.

You're also wrong about them not receiving weapons training. Many have clients that are more than happy to give them some range time.

If anybody should get with a prostitute, it should be you. The independent escort forums are full of women who know how to act civilized. Many act like real ladies. With your crappy attitude, and stupidity, there's a lot that you could learn from them.

No comments: