Saturday, April 18, 2015

Dennis (Denny) Howard Chevalier Uses his Phony PhD to justify his Wearing a Lab Smock

Dennis (Denny) Howard Chevalier poses while wearing a phony lab smock after he received his phony PhD from Kennedy Western University. KWU was a university that didn't have accreditation when Denny Chevalier was working on his phony PhD.  Consequently, Dennis Chevalier didn't do valid doctoral work while "matriculated" at KWU. 

Dennis (Denny) Howard Chevalier "earned" his "PhD" at Kennedy Western University. Throughout the entire time that Denny was working on his "doctorate degree", Kennedy Western University did not have accreditation.

This means that whatever work Dennis Chevalier did for Kennedy Western University didn't count. There's a reason to why they did not have accreditation during the time that Dennis Howard Chevalier was "matriculated" there.

When Denny Chevalier "completed" his "doctorate" degree, he received a card with a bunch of congratulatory statements. These weren't the statements that one would make congratulating someone else for completing a doctorate degree.

Rather, these were comments that you'd make to pat someone in the back... for doing something they originally were expected to be able to do. It's as if they were congratulating a former "problem child".

Dennis (Denny) Chevalier likes to brag about having a "PhD" under his belt. The reality is that he never had one. He had his "dissertation" copyrighted, then he had it registered into the Library of Congress. His "work" has since dropped from their list of stored works. That won't stop Denny Chevalier from bragging that he did "doctoral level work," then bragging that it got accepted into the Library of Congress.

This is all a sham.

Denny Howard Chevalier likes to argue that Kennedy Western University doesn't "now" have the license or accreditation. He's trying to imply that it "had" one when he was working on his "dissertation." The reality is that it never had accreditation. It didn't have one when he was "earning" his "PhD." It doesn't have one now.

Consequently, the degree that he received from Kennedy Western University was not worth the paper that it was printed on.

That didn't stop Dennis Howard Chevalier from nicknaming himself "Doc Chevy." He proceeded to get himself a white lab coat. With this phony PhD degree, he donned his white lab coat and had a photo taken of himself in it.

Jim Parker investigated Dennis (Denny) Chevalier's academic claims. His research concluded that many of Dennis's academic claims were false. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that Dennis's claims of having a "PhD" were false.

Here is part of what he said:

"For one thing, the 'complaint' he posted appears to be altered (as some have clearly noticed.) That last sentence he circled has been added recently. I'm sure I have the original complaint filed away somewhere and it didn't have that part on it, and there's no reason it would have, as the site I dedicated to him only addressed his phony academic credentials -- I hadn't even touched on his military (or lack thereof) credential yet." -- Jim Parker

An ex-girlfriend also saw him and refused to believe that he had a doctoral degree in psychology:

"As a health care professional, I found his claims for having a PhD in psychology a real stretch. There's NO WAY he has a PhD in Psych. most doctoral professionals have lots of educational and training materials for referencing diagnoses. There was nothing of that sort in the house. All he talked about was how 'educated' he was, how valiant a warrior he was, how he was a 'serial rapist profiler', how he was investigating all these 'stolen valor' 'posers'." -- flyonthewall

His writings across the Internet, on behalf of his business, don't reflect well on somebody that claims to have a PhD. They don't reflect well on someone that allegedly ran a business related to law enforcement.

Ladies, Dennis (Denny) Howard Chevalier received a phony PhD from a diploma mill that was not accredited to award academic degrees. He's a phony doctor, phony veteran, phony SWAT veteran, phony PhD holder, etc.

Not only is Dennis Chevalier guilty of stolen valor, he's also guilty of stolen scholar.

Lyle Andersen Proves That He's Clueless about How the Economy Works

Lyle Andersen: They done more to help the economy than you and I have.

Actually, President Obama and the Democrat's progressive "economic policies" acted as a "major headwind" to our economy. Their policies have definitely not been the tailwind behind our current economic performance, wherever people think it lays.

The fact that our economy still shows movement is testament to many things. One of them is that Obama's policies can't destroy the free market as fast as he wants to destroy it.

History has shown that the best thing that the government could do, to help the economy, is to get out of the way and to do virtually nothing.

Progressive economic policies is to the economy what laxatives are to diarrhea.

Obama's policies didn't get the economy to where it is at now. Without his policies, the economy would be further ahead in growth than where it is now. Lowered unemployment numbers resulting from people dropping out of the workforce is nothing to be proud of.

He is the most incompetent president in modern times.

Lyle Andersen: [name redacted] what did you personally do to help the economy,give three points please,note getting up and going to work is honorable but is a Basic step. (STRAWMAN FALLACY)

Lyle, what I personally did for the economy isn't relevant. The argument is on whether Democrat policies were effective for the economy or not. Matter of fact, your initial reply had nothing to do with the initial post on this thread.

The reason I jumped on the Obama angle is because you made it about President Obama allegedly doing something for the economy.

The fact of the matter is that Democrats in general didn't do anything substantial to help the economy along. If anything, their policies created an environment that caused the rich, super rich, and business owners... the people that create the most jobs in the free market... to hold onto their earning instead of invest it.

His "solutions" were aimed at giving money back to the "poor" or "middle-class." The problem is that the economic engine happens to be the very people that the Democrats and progressives demonize, the rich and super rich. These are the people that contribute the bulk of consumer spending. They also pay the majority of personal income tax to the government.

Jobs don't exist so that people could put food on the table. They exist because some rich guy/gal, or someone hoping to get rich, saw that job as a necessity to his/her efforts to get richer. When you create an economic environment that discourages them from hiring more people, or from keeping most of their employees, you hamper good job growth. In fact, you contribute to job market contraction.

Apparently, you fell asleep in class when they were trying to teach you economics back in the 1960s and 1970s.

Lyle Andersen: (2 ) blankety blaming somebody without naming Pacific issues, is not stating a fact. and I suspect there is a bias on your part because you're hate black people because there black. (3)so I will stay with the facts I was taught in the 60s and 70s. 

Lyle, how about advancing some facts instead of just talking about them? All you've done was talk about "staying with facts," however, you have not advanced any facts. Not a single part of your post, or the one before, contained relevant facts. You've talked the talk, now how about walking the walk?

I provided you with facts in the previous post. Apparently, whatever it was that you were taught in the 1960s and 1970s, it didn't include researching the topic that you choose to argue.

Earlier, I talked about how the best thing that the government could do with regards to the economy is "nothing." That's a fact. Read about the depression that took place in the 1920s. It lasted approximately 1 year. The following decade, we had the Great Depression. That lasted for years.

What was the difference between the depression that took place in the 1920s, and the one that took place in the 1930s? The answer is what I stated in my earlier post, government did "nothing". The government did nothing significant, with regards to addressing the 1920s depression, in order to get us out of the depression.

That following decade? The government got involved to try to "solve the problem." Government action resulted in the worst economic crisis in US history.

That's just one of the facts that I talked about in my previous post. Certainly, someone should have told you about that part of our history... back when you were "learning" to "stick with the facts" in the 1960s or 1970s.

Also, for someone that likes to lecture about facts, but doesn't use them, your opinion about what I said doesn't constitute refutation. It also doesn't constitute fact.

Accusing me of being racist, because I disagree with many of the president's policies, demonstrates your bias in favor of progressives and against conservatives. In fact, it demonstrates you as being a "sheep." Who, in their right mind, would actually believe that we disagree with the president because he's "black"?

The fact of the matter is that I'd support people like Herman Cain, Condoleezza Rice, Michael Steele, Clarence Thomas, Allen West, etc. against any white, brown, red, green, blue, black, etc., liberal any time.

Your assumption that I "hate" the president because he's "black," arrogantly assumes that his policies, policies that you agree with, are "fact." If you are someone that was taught to "stick with the facts," you failed those that taught you.

Here's a fact for you: I disagree with the president, and the Democrats, on many of their policies. I would have the same disagreement if we had a white president advancing the same policies. This disagreement doesn't constitute hate.

Either they didn't teach you to "stick with the facts" back in the 1960s and 1970s... or you fell asleep when they tried to teach you guys that. Whether you like it or not, I brought up specific issues specific to the argument on this thread. Those are facts. Since you insist that they're something other than facts, I seriously doubt that you "stick with the facts."

I stated the facts. Your arrogance is insisting that these facts are something else.

Lyle Andersen Ignores His Golden Boy's Wars

Lyle Andersen: The Great Depression came to an end when our economy got railroaded by World War II. Great recession is doing better with out starting a world war. (STRAWMAN FALLACY) 

Again, you deliberately missed the point. In fact, without realizing it, your first statement here backed something I said in my previous post.

As I mentioned earlier in this thread, the Great Depression resulted mainly from government intervention into the economy. World War II forced the kind of demand that was needed to really jolt us out of the depression.

Great Recession? The reality is that we entered a recession in the latter half of 2008, then we plunged into a depression in 2009. We remained in an economic depression until 2012.

"Great Recession" is a political play on words.

When used by the liberals, its intent is to tie this around President Bush's neck. The reality is that decades of government intrusion into the free market brought about this economic crisis.

For those that see that we had actually entered a depression, the term "great recession" is just a "feel good" moniker. Heaven forbid that your "golden" guy be tied to that depression.

As for starting wars... Have you not paid attention to the news?

Does "Libya" ring a bell? How about ISIS in Iraq and Syria? Do they ring a bell? Anybody paying attention to the news would know that we've been in a state of war throughout President Obama's presidency.

This is not about a "war" pulling us out of or into a depression or recession. This is about the negative, or positive, impact a specific policy has on the economy. THAT's what I'm arguing to counter your insinuation that President Obama did "something" positive for the economy.

Here's reality. The economy moved "forward" despite, and not because of, President Obama's policies.

Lyle Andersen: It just boggles my mind how hard-core Republicans think Americans have the right to demand a golden Robust economy going all the time. (STRAWMAN FALLACY) 

You mean, like how hard-core Democrats/progressives/liberals demanded a golden, robust economy going on all the time? They love to demand this when a Republican is in office.

Your actual statements on this thread counters your claim that you were taught to "stick to the facts." Nowhere in my replies on this thread did I "demand" a "golden robust economy" going on "all the time."

My statements were specific.

I said that the best thing that the government could do in relation to the economy is "nothing". That's a historical fact. [Redacted], [redacted], and [redacted] could tell you that I'm in favor of the free market controlling the economy, not the government.

What should boggle your mind is how you're a textbook example of a mindless drone... someone that simply repeats liberal talking head talking points in an argument instead of advancing his own arguments.

This post brought to you courtesy of Dragon Naturally Speaking Version 13. :D

Lyle Andersen: Sorry ,if you think I'm going read all that ranting you are nuts. Good night Learn the 4 W's of journalism. And keep it Short and quick.

You're not the first one to say that to me over the decade I've been debating against liberals online. You're definitely not going to be the last one to say that. In fact, my brother [redacted], and cousin [redacted], told me the same thing. I did what I wanted to do, which is the opposite to what they wanted me to do back then, and to what you told me here.

The reality is that like the majority of liberals that I've argued with... You can't stand seeing a logical, reasoned, fact-based argument destroying your argument, assumptions, and opinions. Especially one that makes you realize that you're wrong, or one that starts to make you question your own argument. The longer the response, the more you see that you're wrong, and the more you start questioning your own argument.

I guarantee you that if I were to use a similar post length, in an argument supporting your argument, you'd be congratulating me. You'd be telling me how I present a well thought out, reasoned, post.

Heck, compared to the other posts that I've generated, that last post was not "long." My brothers could tell you about my reply lengths here. But, even what they've seen is nothing compared to what I've posted elsewhere in arguments against liberals.

Normally, when people are taught to stick with the facts, they're taught to do the research behind the facts. They're taught to do a lot of reading in addition to that research. Apparently, you forgot that part of "sticking to the facts."

Your posts above fall short of the, "who, when, what, where, and why", also known as the 5 Ws of journalism. Not 4. All you've done was ask "what." So much for your claims that you "learned to stick with the facts."

I'm going to tell you what I told the others that made demands similar to yours. I don't accommodate those that I debate with. I'm going to generate however long a post I need to destroy your argument.

Lyle Andersen: [redacted],your brother [redacted] is basically ask me to be more open minded. 

Wrong, Lyle, I'm not telling you to be more open minded.  I'm telling you to actually do your research. I'm also telling you to advance an augment based on reason, facts, and logic.  I also told you to start using the facts, instead of just talking about "sticking to the facts."

Lyle Andersen: While at the same time Blame liberals for all that is wrong in the world. 

First, where, in in my posts, do I specifically blame liberals for everything going wrong in the world? Where?

Second, I didn't blame liberals for everything that was wrong in the world.  I accurately pointed out the negative impacts of progressive/democrat economic policies.  Those are facts, not opinion.

Lyle Andersen: Sorry that is way to simple an idea to fix what is wrong in the world.

First, wrong. The only "simple" I'm seeing here is your interpretation of what I said. You're advancing a strawman, you're addressing something I didn't address.

Second, it helps to understand what you are reading. I know for fact that a fifth-grader could understand what I'm saying here. I know this because I had a fifth-grader understand me when I generated things like this before.

If you cannot understand a post that a fifth-grader could understand, that speaks volumes about your failure at reading comprehension.

This reading comprehension failure argues against your claims of having learned to "stick to the facts." Hence, my demanding for you to advance the facts instead of talking about them.

Lyle Anderson Wouldn't Recognize the Fact Even if it Hit Him on the Face

Lyle Andersen: The only facts I see are ,way to many people truly believe if they truly believe in an pinons hard enough and deep enough that makes them true, or as [redacted] says a fact. [Redacted] believe in himself,a lot which can be a good thing some of the time. I come to this conclusion by his use of the 'I' word almost 40 times. 

I'm not advancing opinion, I'm advancing the facts. This isn't a case where I am "insisting" that I'm "right" because that's what "I want." For example, I pointed out facts about government intervention in the free market. This is historical fact. I'm not making this up, and I'm not just voicing it because it harms the Democrats/progressives.

I'm mentioning it because it happened in history. I'm repeating FACTs. It's a fact that we had a depression in the 1920s. It's a fact that that depression that did not last the entire decade back then. In fact, it was approximately a year in duration. The government did little to nothing to try to bring that economy back. The free market corrected the economy, and it came right back.

The following decade, we had the Great Depression. This largely resulted from government intervention into the economy when the free market was trying to "correct" the economy.

Again, you have to be extremely delusional if you're going to insist that this is nothing but "opinion." It's not.

Study after study has been done on the government's impact on the economy. It's simply human nature. If you threaten the rich, superrich, business owners, etc., with more taxes, they're going to have less incentive to spend money. Or, they'll sit on their money more and invest in economy less.

That's a fact, not opinion.

Lyle Andersen: The only fact I openly embrace is ,JFK openly embrace brings being called a liberal. JFK turn Cuba missile crisis , without firing a shot. A liberal idea. Therefore I don't mind being called a liberal.

That resulted from JFK botching up of a major foreign policy decision.  His predecessor had authorized a joint Cuban immigrant and us military operation that would've toppled Fidel Castro.

All that was needed was the Navy's air power. At the last minute, JFK called it off.

Had the Navy pilots been able to do their part, they would've destroyed Cuban Air power and destroyed Cuban armor on the ground. The Cuban immigrants were destroying the Cuban military on the ground during the battle.

Unfortunately, JFK called off the air power.

It was JFK's decision, to not to carry out the United States' part of the operation, that emboldened Nikita Khrushchev to deploy nuclear weapons to Cuba. He rightfully saw that the United States was a paper tiger under JFK. He saw JFK as a weak leader.

In order to get the Russians to withdraw their missiles, the United States had to give up a forward nuclear missile position. At the end of this scenario, the United States was "weaker" relative to the USSR.

Lyle Andersen: You didn't destroy any thing. 

I thoroughly destroyed your arguments above. For example, you showcased JFK in the way he handled the "Cuba Missile Crisis." You demonstrated your lack of knowledge of history. By ignoring the fact that had it not been for John F. Kennedy's backing down, we would not have had that crisis in the first place.

You also completely forgot that at the end of that crisis, we were in a slightly more disadvantaged position than what we were in before.

This is one example of how I went through and destroyed your arguments point by point. You refused to acknowledge that. However, your refusing to acknowledge that does not dismiss the fact that you've totally been discredited on this thread... And that you've been destroyed in this argument.

Lyle Andersen: [redacted] flaws with your argument. 

No, my argument is solid. It has been solid throughout this thread.

You claimed that my argument has "flaws," quotation marks used strongly, however you didn't advance an argument addressing my rebuttals. You did nothing to prove me "wrong." All you're doing is talking about your opinion about what I did.

How about advancing the facts to "prove" me "wrong"? So far, you failed. You exposed NO flaws in my argument.

Lyle Andersen: You Most likely have a business degree an not journalism. 

The kind of degree that I have has no bearing on the topic of this thread outside of any discussion of the economy. When it comes to the parts of this thread that have nothing to do with the economy, it doesn't matter if I have a business degree or not. What matters is that I have the relevant facts.

For someone that claims that he likes to "stick with the facts," you continue to fail to do your research to see whether or not I'm "wrong." Again, quotation marks used strongly.

Lyle Andersen: And I do complement you on your typing skills. 

What part of the following statement did you not understand?

"Brought to you by Dragon NaturallySpeaking 13." -- [Redacted]

"NaturallySpeaking" suggests that there was "speaking" involved in generating these posts. You, having claimed that you learned to, "stick with the facts," would've seen that as my generating these posts using "speech to text."

Using dictation software on online debates is my standard operating procedure. Next time, pull your head out of your poop chute and remove your horse blinders before you fart out of your mouth.

Lyle Andersen: It is call the four W's you simple minded BS Degree. 

Wrong, Stupid, it's called the FIVE W's of journalism.

Also, for someone that claims to "stick to the facts," I don't have a BS Degree. In fact, you apparently know who [redacted] is. Why don't you just ask [redacted] what degrees I have? Why don't you just ask any of my brothers on this thread what kind of degree I have?

Hint: It's a graduate-level degree, and it's not a "BS."

The only BS that I'm seeing here is I what I see you posting.

Lyle Andersen Defends his 4 "Ws" of Journalism

Lyle Andersen: What, where , when and who are consider the facts of the store. Why, is not alway available. Is sought after in the story. 

Wrong as usual. In the majority of the news segments that I've watched, and in the majority of the news articles that I've read, I've seen/read the 5W's.

I'll give you an example, an NPR article on Brian Williams stepping away from the anchor desk.

Who: Brian Williams
What: stepped away from the anchor desk
When: around the time the announcement was made
Where: NBC nightly news
Why: the comment he made about being shot at while in a military helicopter in Iraq

Even if you don't have the "why" to the story, and if you have to get it after the initial "breaking" story, that initial story is updated to include the "why." That "why" is not indefinitely left out. Hence, the 5W's.

In this article that I looked at, they were not specific as to the "when" other then he "has" stepped away from the anchor podium. Based on your logic, we would have to reduce this to the "3W's" of "journalism." We could "assume" that the action is taken "now," but your next comment will work against you if you try to argue against this point.

Lyle Andersen: True Journal ethics says it is best not to say why by conjecture.example the car slid off the road because the roads are extremely icy or was the driver texting. Don't know do you. (STRAWMAN)

First, this is a strawman argument. You made the statement about the "4W's"of  journalism. I corrected you and informed you that there were "5W's" of journalism. We're not arguing about "conjecture", or its possibility, just to include the fifth "W".

Second, if this was to appear in the story, all that information would be there in terms of the 5W's. Those are the 5W's that the readers would be thinking about as they read the article. Why? People want to know the full story, and if you don't provide it to them, they'll get it from a competitor.

If a reader of the above example newspaper scenario normally drove in the same area that accident occurred, he/she would also want to know why the driver slid off. The "why" of your scenario would be included in the story.

Third, any of the 5W's could be subject to "conjecture" when in the hands of people like you. That's not the point behind the fact that you were wrong about the W's of journalism.

Lyle Andersen: When stating a fact it is best to state your sources. 

So, if I were to tell you that the Earth orbits the sun, you won't believe me until I show you my source of information for that? First, the facts that I provided you are researchable. All you had to do was to get off your lazy "face" and do that research. Second, you've provided no resources to back your arguments relative to the argument.

Lyle Andersen: No I do not have a journalism degree. 

You don't know what you're talking about on this thread either.

Lyle Andersen: my sources are Harl Andersen associate press for 32 years. Vic Andersen Rochester New York. Mark and Erin editors Lincoln star paper. 

You could find my sources, on the 5W's, by simply doing a Google search. So far, the majority of the results talk about the 5W's of journalism. This is based on the following being typed in the search field: "Ws of journalism."

You could also see the 5W's in play as a story develops.

Lyle Anderson: Generally agree distraction good journalism. Is business degrees and others wanting easy answers.

Whether you like or not, it's the 5W's of journalism. If you read a news article, or watch it on the television, you'll see the 5W's in play. If one of those are missing, an update is immediately generated as soon as that missing W is discovered. This is in addition to any other updates. That update completes the initial story in advance of any updates that happen later down the road.

Tuesday, April 14, 2015

Woman at 800 Sheraton Drive Pulls Easter Card While Being Clueless About Easter

A Soldier failed to ensure that he was done with his drilling obligations before he quit going to Battle Assemblies. This Soldier remained on the books while missing months of drill weekends. That soldier risked being removed from the Army with an Other Than Honorable (OT H) discharge.

If that were your son, would you help him achieve a better outcome, or would you seal his fate?

I came up to this woman's house and pushed her doorbell. The purpose? To follow up on our last encounter to see if she had any luck contacting her son. I figured that as his mother, she'd want what's best for her son.

Included in this want would be a desire for her son to complete his military career with honor.

During our last visit, she told me that her son was out of the military. Her son explained to her that he submitted an Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) packet and that he was no longer required to drill.

I responded by telling her that he was still in and that his IRR packet "got lost".

I explained to her that her son was not out of the military as he explained. He submitted a transfer request from the Troop Program Unit (TPU) to the IRR. Unfortunately, those in position to forward this packet "dropped the ball". The packet disappeared into a "black hole" that existed in the bureaucracy.

Consequently, her son remained on the books and continued to have a drilling requirement.

What really happened, based on my talking to soldiers in similar situations, was that her son was originally in as a "Cadet Senior". Since he did not get selected to continue with a commissioning program, he was under the impression that he no longer had to drill.

Regardless of which scenario was applicable to her son, he should have continued to drill. Continuing to show up "once a month", and calling for IRR packet progress every week, are helpful when ensuring that the TPU to IRR transition happens. If he knew he couldn't make it to drill, he would've been able to request rescheduled training.

Between drills, he could've helped change his status by consistently calling the unit to check on his IRR packet progress. He didn't. He moved on with his life assuming that the unit would take care of everything.

That's where I came in.

My unit tasked me to track these Soldiers down. These were Soldiers who stopped participating and stopped responding to our communications. My job was to be the "last ditch effort" to salvage their, and her son's, career.

We had to make on effort to contact them and to try to get them to drill again. We had to exhaust our efforts before we get these soldiers processed out on an OTH discharge. This kind of discharge follows a former service member for life.

Instead of helping me move forward with salvaging her son's career, she got belligerent with me. She refused to open the door; she demanded to know who I was. Never mind that I explained to her who I was when I saw her last.

When I asked if she relayed my message to her son, she demanded that I leave the property. She said something about "this being Easter."

Those actions proved to me that the Woman of the House, at 800 Sheraton Drive, knew nothing of the meaning of Easter.

Specifically, what would Jesus have said in this situation? The Bible gives a hint. In Luke Chapter 14, Paragraph 5 of the New Testament, he says this:

"...And answered them, saying, which of you shall have an *** or an ox fallen into a pit, and will not straightway pull him out on the Sabbath day?"

The people that Jesus was talking to refused to drop what they were doing to help someone. Jesus asked them if it was illegal to heal on the Sabbath. Jesus turned around and healed the guy despite the fact that it was the Sabbath.

I didn't see whether her family was eating or not, but that didn't matter. She dishonored the man whose resurrection she was "celebrating" by being the person that Jesus criticized and called "hypocrite".

The two families that I visited, before talking to this woman, didn't pull the "It's Easter" card. They helped me, as Christians celebrating Easter would.

Perhaps her idea of Easter was sitting around in the quiet of her home, not to have to deal with anybody outside. If that's her idea, and that I should be "sent away" because it was Easter, then she had no moral authority to pull the "it's Easter" card.

Easter celebrates the resurrection of the man whose teachings she failed to follow that day.

Years of missing holidays due to military service trumps nonmilitary tradition preserved by military service.

Building on that concept, since when do we stop the mission during a holiday? Was I to "leave a Soldier behind" because the only day in my schedule to reach out to him happened to be on Easter? In my 23 year military career, I lost count of how many holidays I missed while I was on deployment. I missed a whole slew of holidays during Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Heck, many Soldiers didn't even get a Super Bowl viewing opportunity during that deployment. We went on mission instead.

I also missed numerous holidays, successive holidays, during previous deployments. When I pushed her doorbell that Easter day, I had that mindset.

It's because of generations of our efforts, down to those of us currently serving, that this woman could sit back in the comfort of her home enjoying Easter with her family. The radical elements that America is fighting would execute her for celebrating Easter. Eating that ham might just make things worse in that scenario.

Also, I didn't see if she had any "I support the troops" stickers on her car. If I did, I would've taken a picture of it and posted it with this article.

By refusing to help me help her son conclude his career with honor, she removed any standing she had with bragging that she had a son that served in the military... Or even claim that she supported the troops.

So where does that bring us, more specifically, her son? Her demand that I leave ended my efforts to "recover" her son. I had no choice but to go home and to generate the "attempt to contact" memorandum explaining our inability to recover her son. This was one item needed in the packet application to discharge a Soldier for substandard performance.

Her son is not out of the military as of the generation of this post. That memorandum, as part of a discharge packet, will change that. Granted, her son is accountable for his actions. His mother's actions; however, sealed his fate.

I hope she enjoyed her Easter, her son is about to make a lifelong sacrifice partly because of it.

Wednesday, April 08, 2015

Dennis (Denny) Howard Chevalier's Phony Military Claims Part I -- An Interview

Johannes Hans Fallada: Dennis (Denny) Chevalier claims that This Ain't Hell is an American Legion Blog, is that true?

thebesig: They're separate entities. This Ain't Hell is a privately owned blog. Jonn Lilyea and Mark Seavey are its main administrators. 

Hans Fallada: So where did Dennis (Denny) Chevalier get the idea that the American Legion owns "This Ain't Hell"?

thebesig: Dennis Howard Chevalier thinks that because one of the administrators works for the American Legion, that the American Legion owns TAH. That would be like someone claiming that the military owns and runs my own personal blog. Pure nonsense. But then again, so is Dennis Chevalier. 

Hans Fallada: Dennis (Denny) Chevalier told Robert Quentin that he was accused of impersonating a Lieutenant Colonel (LTC) of the Civil Air Patrol. Do you have any knowledge of someone accusing him of such?

thebesig: No. We acknowledged that Dennis Howard Chevalier was a member of CAP. We weren't contesting that. We had issues with him claiming Gulf War service as a C130 pilot, of his claiming C130 pilot experiences, and of his claiming to be a retired USAF LTC. 

Hans Fallada: On his blog, Dennis (Denny) Chevalier claimed that you guys questioned his Texas State Guard and his reserve police officer experiences. He showed evidence that he was part of those organizations. What do you say about that?

thebesig: Denny wasted his time with that entry. We didn't doubt that he served as a reserve police officer, we didn't doubt his service with the Texas State Guard. 

Hans Fallada: Dennis (Denny) Chevalier insists that he never claimed that he was a member of the USAF, that he never was a USAF officer, that he never flew C130s, and that he didn't claim to have deployed to Iraq during the Gulf War. Why don't you believe him?

thebesig: He left comments up, throughout the internet, making those claims. TAH posters collected screen captures of him making those statements, and made the appropriate posts. It didn't stop there. 

Fedupexwifeofdhc, one of his ex-wives, said that she overheard him making those claims to others... face to face. Dennis Chevalier even tried to convince her that "CAP" and "USAF" were the same thing. He did this so that he could turn around and talk about being a USAF LTC. He even tried to convince her that he did, in fact, deploy to Iraq during the Gulf War.

Hans Fallada: But, Dennis (Denny) Chevalier claimed that he got hacked, and that he didn't make those statements. He claimed that a hacker, wanting to take him down because of where his investigation was leading him, created these profiles and made those claims. He even showed documentation on his blog.

thebesig: The name on that documentation, Jim Parker, posted on This Ain't Hell. Jim Parker, thanks to GD Contractor's efforts, jumped on the thread. Jim stated that the document was altered, and that "hacking" wasn't an issue during the abandoned lawsuit. 

We suspected such. Even if Jim didn't jump in, we believed that Dennis (Denny) Chevalier was using "hacking" as an excuse to explain his phony claims away. Fedupexwifeofdhc, one of his ex-wives, came on here and talked about how he blamed hackers when she caught him red handed with his love communications. 

Hans Fallada: So, why didn't Robert Quentin ask Dennis (Denny) Chevalier about Jim Parker?

thebesig: Because Robert Quentin is just another one of Dennis Howard Chevalier's sock puppet. This wasn't a case of someone "looking in from the outside" trying to wade through and make sense out of things. This was Dennis Howard Chevalier using a sock puppet in a futile effort to try to baffle us with nonsense.

Hans Fallada: So Robert Quentin is a sock puppet like me, right?

thebesig: Yes. His Linda Kay and David Cooper entities are also made up names. They are sock puppets, just like Robert Quentin. Dennis Howard Chevalier uses those names as sock puppets.

Hans Fallada: Dennis (Denny) Chevalier talked about his signature block. He claims he got tired and shortened, "USAF Auxiliary CAP, Retired," to just "USAF retired." We're human. Would you be willing to entertain that he did that out of laziness, or under a time crunch, and not out of stolen valor intent?

thebesig: That was deliberate. He wasn't being lazy. On message boards and on emails, you can set your signature. Once you set your signature, you don't have to retype that signature, it shows up with every post, or email, that you make depending on the signature setting that you selected.

Whether he was lazy or not wasn't relevant. Once you set the signature parameters, you don't have to do much else, just generate your post/email and go from there. 

Dennis Howard Chevalier deliberately changed his signature to read, "Lt. Col. USAF Retired." His military dot com profile reflects that attitude.

Hans Fallada: OK, so if a hacker put those comments up, why didn't Dennis Chevalier remove them?

thebesig: Because there was no hacker involved. Dennis Howard Chevalier made those statements with the intention of leaving those statements up "indefinitely." 

Hans Fallada: What makes you say that?

thebesig: Whenever someone on TAH found an old website where Denny made his phony veteran claims, he'd go over to the site and delete it. This shows that HE, and not the hacker, had control of those profiles and comments. 

Hans Fallada: Dennis (Denny) Chevalier claims that the letter to the coin collector is fake. Is that true?

thebesig: The letter that he claims is fake, that was posted on TAH, is genuine. His ex-wife said that he had a habit of blaming others for his own actions. 

Hans Fallada: So when he claimed to be a pilot of an C130 in Iraq, that was him making that claim?

thebesig: Yes. His ex-wife said that Dennis Howard Chevalier bragged about flying a C130 in Iraq. Since he'd make that claim to her, and insist that it's true, he's going to make that claim on a letter.

Dennis (Denny) Howard Chevalier's Phony Military Claims Part II -- An Interview

Hans Fallada: So, when Dennis (Denny) Chevalier denies that he made claims of flying a C130, on any website, he's lying?

thebesig: Yes. His ex-wife witnessed him make that claim in face to face conversations. He tried to convince her that he flew such aircraft. He was adamant about those events happening. What he writes on paper is a reflection of what he says in person. 

Hans Fallada: Dennis (Denny) Chevalier claims that he has enemies wanting to make his life miserable, that they'd say anything, or do anything, to mess with him.

thebesig: All we're doing is gathering facts. We could research this on the Internet, or listen to his ex-wives accounts of marriage with him. Our research, his ex-wives first hand observations, and Dennis Howard Chevalier's statements, work together to build a picture of a man that did in fact claim to have flown C130, who claimed to have USAF service, and who claimed to have combat deployed to Iraq during the Gulf War as a C130 pilot. 

We've confronted him with these facts.

Dennis Howard Chevalier, like a child, refuses to come to terms with the fact that his phony persona has been called out. He's actually panicking, because his phony persona has been thoroughly discredited. He does not want future women, potential dates/wives, to find out about this.

Hans Fallada: Dennis (Denny) Chevalier claims that Scotty Hughes went after him, because Denny posted some of the Scott's links on his site. Is this true?

thebesig: Dennis Howard Chevalier made his Facebook "stolen valor" site look very much like Scotty Hughes' Facebook page. Scott got on Dennis' case for doing this. 

Hans Fallada: Did Dennis (Denny) Chevalier bust any phonies?

thebesig: No. His spoof of a site showed no evidence that he busted any phonies. He attempted to give those, that provided him with leads, questions that'd require them to do the legwork. The sense I got, from reading his replies to them, was that he wanted them to do the work. Once they gave him the results of their search, he could craft a Facebook post that essentially gives him credit for the bust.

Dennis Howard Chevalier didn't make any busts, he was a phony "valor thief hunter," just as he's a phony "retired USAF LTC," a phony "C130 pilot," a phony "Gulf War Veteran," and a phony "SWAT" veteran. 

Hans Fallada: Why do you guys contact people on the phony veteran's friend's list when the issue is with the phony veteran, like Dennis (Denny) Chevalier, and not with them?

thebesig: most of the time when people make false military claims, we've found that these phonies have told their story to friends and family. We want to make sure that they're aware of the truth. 

When Dennis Howard Chevalier got exposed as a phony retired USAF LTC, we had to inform the people on his friend's list, as well as the Texas State Guard, that they had a phony in their midst. 

Hans Fallada: Did Dennis (Denny) Chevalier answer the questions that you asked him?

thebesig: NO.

Hans Fallada: But Dennis (Denny) Chevalier insisted that he answered you guys' questions. He claimed that you guys refused to acknowledge them... he claims that you guys taunted and coursed him instead.

thebesig: We asked him questions specifically addressing his phony claims in 3 areas: his phony claim that he was a retired USAF LTC; his phony claim that he flew C130s; and his phony claim that he combat deployed to Iraq as a C130 pilot during the Gulf War. 

As the threads progressed, we added questions involving his claims of local police level valor awards. "This Ain't Hell" posters asked Dennis Howard Chevalier to provide actual articles to support his claims. They also wanted points-of-contact information so that they could independently verify Denny's claims.

Instead of answering these questions, per the parameters we set, Dennis Howard Chevalier addressed questions that we didn't ask. He spent a lot of time presenting an argument proving things we had no issues with... things that we already believed was the case. 

Hans Fallada: Dennis (Denny) Chevalier claimed that he discovered that half of you guys never served. Is that true?

thebesig: I've served a cumulative of 22 years in the military as of March 2014. That's a little over one year for every day that Dennis Howard Chevalier served in the Army National Guard (20 days). I'm still serving. 

I could tell, based on my own military experience, that a good number of those posting on TAH have military experience. 

Absent being able to recognize someone else's experiences based on my own... or being able to call someone out on their BS based on their lack of experience... or the posters here who've specifically been identified as having served... there's not much one can do to tell who, among the posters, served and who didn't.  

Dennis Howard Chevalier is pulling cheese based crap out of his ass when he makes that claim about half "never" serving. 

Hans Fallada: Did This Ain't Hell put out a "wanted dead or alive" poster on Dennis (Denny) Chevalier?

thebesig: No.

Hans Fallada: But Dennis (Denny) Chevalier claimed that you guys put out wanted posters on him.

thebesig: These wanted posters, including the one on Dennis, don't call for harm or death. They just call on the community to shame these posers for stealing valor and/or claiming military experience that they don't possess.

Hans Fallada: Did you guys drive Wayne Hayden and Ike Densmore to their suicides?

thebesig: No. 

Hans Fallada: Dennis (Denny) Chevalier has accused you guys of being terrorists, and hints that you guys are behind their suicides due to you guys "stalking" them.

thebesig: These veterans claimed experience that they didn't have. A couple of valor blogs called them out. Many veterans spread the truth about him to this veteran's contacts. These veterans could've simply come clean about their experiences, apologized, and moved on. 

They had a choice, they could've taken the honorable action, which I just mentioned. Instead, they made the decision to end their lives. Nobody told them to end their own life... they made that decision themselves, which is unfortunate. 

Nobody told them to end their own lives, they unfortunately made that decision on their own. 

Hans Fallada: You said that you guys gather the facts, then inform people in the phony veteran's contact list. Dennis (Denny) Chevalier claims that you guys have no use for the facts. Only one of you is right about this.

thebesig: Dennis Howard Chevalier considers his emotions, feelings, desires, and wants as "concrete facts." He dismisses facts that harm his position, as "stalking and harassing." Dennis Chevalier has no use for the facts. He makes up for that by lying extensively.

Hans Fallada: Why did you guys inform the Texas State Guard about Dennis (Denny) Chevalier?

thebesig: Because his attitude and conduct is inconsistent with their values. Members of the Texas State Guard posted on one of the Dennis Chevalier threads, and verified that statement. If they're consistent with their values, they'd have more than just Dennis Howard Chevalier's documentation... for the training that he didn't complete... to remove him from the Texas State Guard. 

Hans Fallada: Dennis (Denny) Chevalier claims that if anybody disagrees with you guys' "limited view" of the world, you guys will go after them. He also said that you guys would be terrorists and destroy their lives.

thebesig: The reality is that he refused to answer our simple, straightforward questions. His refusal to answer those questions, his insistence in using red herrings and strawmen required us to hold his feet to the fire. We insisted in requiring him to answer our questions per our parameters. 

His real issue is with us forcing him to answer simple questions he knows would destroy his own argument. He's "terrified" that he'll have to give up his phony persona and rely on his actual persona. 

It's crucial for Dennis Howard Chevalier that these facts do not come to light. He does not want potential dates/wives to see this information.

The destruction that he's talking about is the destruction we're inflicting on his phony persona and his phony background. By logical extension, making his efforts to find a new wife/date more difficult. He can't handle the idea that he'd have to rely on his real persona, accomplishments, and his real world accomplishments instead of one that he wants others to believe.

He can't handle it when we destroy his story in the eyes of the people that he has lied to. 

Hans Fallada:  Dennis (Denny) Chevalier shows a play by play showing things that he complains you guys won't accept. Does this go back to him advancing red herrings and straw men arguments?

thebesig: Yes. I responded to him, point by point, forcing him to stick to the issue. We also forced him to focus on questions that destroy his argument and persona. This is what he means by "twisting and turning." He's tap dancing instead of having the integrity to answer our questions truthfully. 

Hans Fallada: Dennis (Denny) Chevalier claims to have answered all of you guys questions, but you're not satisfied?

thebesig: No, because he answered questions he assumed we asked, or hoped we asked, and not questions that we actually asked him.

Hans Fallada: Dennis (Denny) Chevalier's ex-wife claims spousal abuse, and so does another ex-wife. Dennis Chevalier denies this, so we have a "he said she said" story here. I take it that you don't buy Dennis's claims that those spousal abuse incidents didn't happen.

thebesig: I believe the ex-wives. Prior to fedupexwifeofdhc jumping in, I had slotted Dennis Howard Chevalier into a profile. This is one of many profiles that I've came up with based on the people I've debated with on the internet over the years. 

Fedupexwife substantiated my profile on Dennis (Denny) Chevalier. This included him being a control freak wanting things to go his way, and his being abusive if necessary to get his way. 

Though Dennis Denny Chevalier denies this, and challenges people to find evidence of his being charged and convicted. The domestic violence complaints against Dennis Howard Chevalier are on file with the police department. Fedupexwife has challenged him to look for it, but he refuses.

Denny claims to still be working his phony investigative services, because he wasn't convicted of domestic violence. That doesn't mean that the domestic violence "didn't" happen. It means that he got away with committing domestic violence.

Hans Fallada:  Dennis (Denny) Chevalier refuses to accept the Wilmer Police Department's explanation that they never had a SWAT team and that they were too small to have one. He explains that none of the current people were there when he was there, and that they couldn't speak for the time Dennis was there.

thebesig: Dennis Howard Chevalier is pulling more cheese based crap out of his hind end again. 

An internet search shows that big cities generally have the SWAT teams. The officer at the Wilmer Police Department worked there long enough to know that station's history. He'll also know the resources and manpower that the department has. By logical extension, he'll know what these officers would be able to support. 

Also, if you look at a map of Wilmer, and the surrounding areas, there simply isn't enough of a population density. That's the population that you'll pull your police force from. This suggests that with a smaller population to draw from, you won't have that many people to form a SWAT team with. 

However, Wilmer is close enough to Dallas for it to benefit from a Dallas based SWAT team. 

Hans Fallada:  Dennis (Denny) Chevalier claims that This Ain't Hell is a central location for people with an axe to grind. You've posted there before Dennis Howard Chevalier got his "fame" there, is that close to describing that place?

thebesig:  It's a place for veterans, service members, and their supporters to come together and share information. This is factual information, not "axe to grind" nonsense. We work together to do research on military fakers. Many of us also do our own research. When we've gathered enough information, we provide this information to the administrators of TAH. 

We're working together to hold phony veterans and veteran/military embellishers accountable for their phony claims. We also make sure that we post enough information here for others that decide to do research on these losers. 

We make sure that we have the cold hard facts... given what we're working with... before we present the results of our research. We're not making things up to give people a hard time. 

Hans Fallada:  So this extensive research that you guys do, that's what Dennis (Denny) Chevalier is claiming as "stalking," right?

thebesig: Yes.

Hans Fallada:  This extensive research, and your comments based on this research, is causing Dennis (Denny) Chevalier a lot of high stress, anxiety, and paranoia...

thebesig: It's causing Dennis Howard Chevalier to feel paranoia and stress, because he's seeing that his phony persona and phony military history is threatened. He knows that if we keep on providing information that his claims are false, people around him will no longer believe him.

More importantly, he fears that potential dates/wives will see this information.

If they no longer believe him... if future friends/dates quickly call his claims to question because of our statements here... then Dennis Chevalier's illusions of grandeur would be shattered. What's left is something that Dennis Chevalier can't live with. 

It speaks volumes when Dennis Howard Chevalier has to claim to be a retired USAF LTC to pick women up. This means that he hasn't amounted to much in real life in a way that he could attract women on his own real accomplishments. 

He's a great big loser, a big fat galoot, someone with self-esteem, eating, control, and other issues. If he loses his narcissistic illusions about himself, that's all he'll be left with. 

Hans Fallada: Well, I believe that we covered a lot of ground, do you have anything to add?

thebesig:  Yes. BASF, BP Amoco, Chevron USA, Lyondell Chemical, and Shell, should ring a bell with Dennis Howard Chevalier. Based on fedupexwifeofdhc's statement, Dennis Chevalier has claimed that his exposure to chemicals during the Gulf War made him sick.

So, if I contact their corporate headquarters, legal department, what could I help them discover? They'll need to check on the Dennis Howard Chevalier links on "This Ain't Hell." 

I wonder if Dennis Denny Chevalier blamed his exposure to chemicals in Iraq, and if he won a settlement from those companies as a result of those claims. Well, I could think of one way to find out... :D 

He loses whether he blamed exposure in Iraq or in the US. :twisted: 

Dennis (Denny) Howard Chevalier Blames a Hacker for his Internet Lies, Get's Called Out for This Lie -- An Interview

Hans Fallada: Well ladies, if you're reading this, it's because someone responded to your personal advertisement. This someone goes by the name of Dennis Howard Chevalier. He told you that he flew C130s in Iraq while in the USAF during the Gulf War. He told you that he's a retired USAF LTC. 

Since you wanted find out who he really is, and what's he like, you did an internet search and landed here. 

You're in luck. In this interview, you'll get the basic information you need to decide whether you want to pursue going out with Dennis (Denny) Chevalier... or move on to the next guy.

With me are the women from Dennis Howard Chevalier's past. We have his sixth ex-wife, Dora Lee. We have "Gulf War ex Wife" with us, along with "horseshoesandhandgrenades." The later was in the beginning stages of dating him, but listened to her gut instincts and left. 

We also have "flyonthewall," who has met both Dennis Chevalier and Dora Lee.

We have "thebesig" here to address Dennis Chevalier's military claims. We also have "Jim Parker" here to address Dennis Chevalier's main defense against the "This Aint Hell" debate team. 

We've sent invitations out to Chevalier and Associates. Dennis (Denny) Chevalier, Robert Quentin, David Cooper, and Linda Kay. They're here with us today. 

With that being said, welcome everybody to the program.

thebesig: Thanks, we're glad to be here.

Dennis Chevalier and Associates: ...

Hans Fallada: Thebesig, could you give us a summary of what's going on?

thebesig: Sure! :D This started when someone got wind that Dennis Howard Chevalier was going around claiming to be a retired USAF LTC, that he flew C130s in Iraq during the Gulf War, that he got injured in a police mission that resulted in him getting awarded police level valor awards, etc.

One of the things that got the spotlight focused on Dennis (Denny) Chevalier was his obsession with Don Shipley, and his pirating of Scotty Hughes artwork for a copycat site.

Hans Fallada: Dennis, is that what happened?

Dennis Chevalier: A hacker did it. Only a fool keeps trying to push that crappy position that I am impersonating someone or something.

Dora Lee: Dennis, you told anyone that would listen how you flew C-130s and how you were on the compass call and when you flew by it was lights out for the Taliban...

Narrator: Dora Lee turns towards Hans Fallada...

Dora Lee: ...He had a helmet, that was a pilot helmet that he kept under glass that had "Hollywood" on the backside. He said that was his call sign in Iraq. He also told me that the reason he got cancer was because of exposure to the oil.

thebesig:  Dennis (Denny) Chevalier, you accuse a hacker of going around and making claims about you serving in the Air Force, about you flying C130s, and about you serving in Iraq. You insinuate that you didn't have anything to do with that.

Hans Fallada: "Gulf War ex Wife," you were married to Dennis Howard Chevalier during the Persian Gulf War. Did he actually deploy to Iraq?

Gulf War ex Wife: He would not have been eligible to go to Iraq and he didn't. He never left the state of Texas while we were married.

Hans Fallada: How long was your marriage to Dennis Howard Chevalier?

Linda Kay: They were married from November of 1989 to July of 1991.

Hans Fallada: Now, about this hacker...

Dora Lee: Dennis will bully and divert and blame everyone for anything that goes wrong in his life. Right now he is blaming me for hacking, if I knew how to hack, I would be a millionaire!

thebesig: Dora, didn't you say that Dennis (Denny) Chevalier blames a hacker whenever he's caught red handed making comments he later distances himself from?

Dora Lee: Yes.

Dennis Howard Chevalier: You say I claimed to be a C130 Pilot and flew in Iraq but no proof is found anywhere except by a hacked letter by Parker.... But the most significant was the issue of me being hacked in early 2000 with manufactured documents by J. Parker that included USAF, C130's, Iraq and much much more. I filed a lawsuit against him.

Hans Fallada: So, did you file a criminal complaint against Jim Parker for hacking you, and making those comments for you? 

Dennis Howard Chevalier: I didn't file a criminal case against Parker because he admitted his wrong doings...yeah I know not a great move either but it does support what I have said all along...

Hans Fallada: Jim, let me bring you in to respond, he dropped the case. Was it for your wrong doings, or for something else? 

Jim Parker: He dropped his silly law suit...

His case was un-winnable (he didn't have a single shred of evidence).

In appearing for the case, I would be able to introduce all his phony "credentials" into the public record for the whole world to see, and I'd make damn sure they saw it.

I reminded him of the penalties in Texas for filing frivolous and baseless law suits, as well as the fact that by simply filing the complaint, he had already committed perjury (signed petitions are considered sworn statements in Texas and therefore fall under CHAPTER 37 of the Texas Penal Code entitled: PERJURY AND OTHER FALSIFICATION).

He trundled his fat ass down to the court house the very next day and dropped the suit.

Hans Fallada: Let's focus on the lawsuit that Dennis (Denny) Chevalier tried to start. Let's ignore the first part of the complaint comment, as we've established that was BS anyway. We'll focus on the part that supports Denny's claims; that a hacker, presumably you, created profiles for him. Through these profiles, the hacker made claims about him flying C130s, about him flying C130s in Iraq during the Gulf War, and about him being a retired USAF LTC. 

You say that you didn't do that, but Dennis Chevalier claims that's precisely what you did...

David Cooper: Haaaaaaah... I got you Dennis buddy... I was there when Dennis Chevalier filed that claim, that part wasn't there. Hacking wasn't anywhere in Dennis Chevalier's cognitive process back then, he just wanted to get even with Jim Parker for exposing his phony academic credentials.

This hacking thing about his claims is just an excuse to cover up Dennis (Denny) Chevalier's lies... KAH-COW!

thebesig: I did notice that although the writing on the comments section came from the same person, their appearance was such that the "hacking complaint " showed that it wasn't written on the same day as the previous portion of the complaint. He circled the portion that he added in.

Hans Fallada: Let's go back to Jim Parker... on This Ain't Hell, you claimed that you received a copy of the complaint. Did yours have the circled portion shown on Dennis Chevalier's blog?

Jim Parker: I only glanced briefly at the silly shit he's posting on his "evidence" blog, and it's friggin' hilarious!

For one thing, the "complaint" he posted appears to be altered (as some have clearly noticed). That last sentence he circled has been added recently. I'm sure I have the original complaint filed away somewhere and it didn't have that part on it, and there's no reason it would have, as the site I dedicated to him only addressed his phony academic credentials -- I hadn't even touched on his military (or lack thereof) credential yet...

Linda Kay: ... During our Chevalier and Associates staff meeting in the bathroom one night, when Denny ate a 7 pound block cheese, Dennis (Denny) Chevalier told us about his "war" stories. He did say that he flew C130s in Iraq, and that he was a retired USAF LTC... KAH-COW!

Dora Lee: I keep questioning him, how can USAF and CAP be one in the same? CIVAL... AIR... PATROL... UNITED... STATES... AIR... FORCE! Wonder if he thinks because they both have "AIR" in the title they are one in the same? He spent 2 years trying to convince me they were the same.

thebesig: Dennis (Denny) Chevalier tried to convince Dora Lee that CAP and USAF was the same thing, because he needed validation. From there, he could proceed to claim that he was a retired USAF LTC. With that, he could go on to continue to claim that he flew C130s in Iraq.

He had already told these lies to Dora Lee when they met, but he still needed validation. He knows for a fact that he never was in the USAF, that he never was a C130 pilot, and that he never was deployed to Saudi Arabia/Iraq during the Gulf War.

He still insisted on making these claims face to face. He can't blame that on a hacker, unless he's willing to claim that a ghost possessed him to make those comments.

Hans Fallada: So, we've established that Dennis (Denny) Chevalier was never in the military. Based on the document that he placed on his site, he did 20 days in the actual National Guard, and was in the inactive guard until the early '90s. He did nothing for the country for the inactive guard portion, all he had was an "affiliation" with the guard... unless there's documentation showing that he got kicked out of the inactive guard as well. 

Robert Quentin: Correct... KAH-COW!

thebesig: Dennis Howard Chevalier made numerous verbal claims that he, as an Air Force officer, flew C130s in Iraq during the Gulf War. He told anyone that'd listen. He matched this by making similar matching statements on the internet. A hacker didn't make those claims, Dennis (Denny) Chevalier made those claims.

Hans Fallada: I noticed that the "associates" in "Chevalier and Associates" keep saying, "KAH-COW," and they appear to contradict Dennis Chevalier's claims. I also noticed that their clothing has blue themes as opposed to the yellow themes on what Dennis Chevalier is wearing. I also noticed that the "associates" have falcon symbols.

David Cooper: Haaaaaaaaaah... because we're his buddy, and we have his back!

Linda Kay: Haaaaaaaaaah... Blue Falcons! That's us!

Robert Quentin: Haaaaaaaaaah... KAH-COW!

Hans Fallada: OK, based on an overwhelming first hand observations, we can conclude that Dennis (Denny) Chevalier never was in the USAF. He never flew C130s, he didn't deploy to the Middle East during the Gulf War to fly C130s over Iraq, and that he can't claim to be a retired USAF LTC. 

Now, let's move on to what it's like to be married to Dennis Chevalier, or to be dating him...

Dennis Chevalier: This interview is over...

Hans Fallada: Yup, it's about time we break anyway. In the next interview, we'll cover the marriage and relationship issues, so that our female viewers can get a fair description of what a relationship with Dennis Howard Chevalier is like.

Dennis Howard Chevalier, good luck at your next Texas State Guard drill!

Dennis (Denny) Howard Chevalier Convinces His Dates to Marry Him Soon, he Can't Handle Being Nice -- An Interview

Hans Fallada: Ladies, if you're reading this, it's because you just did an internet search on Dennis (Denny) Chevalier. You're considering whether to go on a date with him or not... or you're starting to suspect that he's a bit "loco". 

The previous interview covered Dennis Howard Chevalier's phony military claims. Today, we'll cover his relationships with women.

First, Dora Lee. Tell us about when you met with Dennis Howard Chevalier.

Dora Lee: When we met, he gave me this sob story. First, a drunk driver killed his wife and baby. Then he married again, he caught this next wife in bed with another man when he "returned" from "active duty". He chased his ex-wife's lover down the street while the later was still naked. After the chase, he came back and kicked her out.

He claimed that his next wife was a druggy and that she left their baby with a sister. He claimed that this sister was a drug dealer who took the baby to Oklahoma. He said he had to borrow a plane. He flew over to Oklahoma and landed on a highway. He broke into their house by gun point, stole the kid back, then flew back to Texas.

Hans Fallada: When did the problems begin? 

Dora Lee: Once we got married, he changed. It was more of "I own you"! He wanted on my life insurance policy, and hounded me till he was on it. He wanted on my health insurance, and kept after me to make sure he was on it.

He kept us so broke, and he consistently bounced checks. I spent my money trying to cover NSF fees. His spending was out of control, he would spend 3 dollars for 1 patch and spend 7 dollars for shipping. No common sense!

Hans Fallada: What would you say Dennis Howard Chevalier's true nature is? 

Dora Lee: He is 100% narcissistic! I'm talking a severe case!

Hans Fallada: To be fair, Dennis (Denny) Chevalier isn't here to defend himself. He's in a padded room, beating the padding severely as if it was the women and children he assaulted. 

So, for the women reading this, could you give me an example of his narcissism?

Dora Lee: He sends me an email at work asking me why I contacted the Fort Worth Star Telegram telling them he was deceased? WTF?! I told him that I was at work and that I did not have any time to do that.

He forwards my alleged email to me. It was obvious that it originated from his email. He responded by saying that he was hacked. Nonsense, the real reason is that he likes the drama!

Hans Fallada: How did he treat your son?

Dora Lee:One time, when he thought I wasn't paying attention to him, I watched him swap out his own pills for my sons pain pills. About a week later he wanted to try to convince me that my son was trying to kill him. That resulted in us fighting. If I didn't follow his agenda and go with what he said, we were fighting.

Dennis (Denny) Chevalier Robs His Ex-Wife of Needed Care, Medication, and Her Money Shortly after Her Surgery - an Interview

Johannes Hans Fallada: Did he stop being cruel to you when you got sick? 

Dora Lee: He kept stealing my pain killers. I was on OxyContin. I couldn't take the crap because it made me ill. He would take them and he would yell at me because I was out of pain meds. He would accused me of being the druggy.

Dora Lee: I was at work and I bent over to put my camera bag in the car and couldn't get up. The pain was so horrid they had to call the ambulance to come get me. By the time I finally spoke with Dennis, it was about 7 PM. I've already have been admitted into my room and it's about 7 PM. He was wondering where I was. I told him I was already in the hospital. He said, "You're in good hands, I don't need to come see you because you sound all drugged up and you won't remember if I'm there or not".

Dora Lee: He showed up 2 days later when he found out his ex-wife and son were coming to see me. They stayed about an hour and left, Dennis left with them. He showed up again to pick me up. We made an arrangement where I would call Dennis Chevalier when the doctor released me so that he could come over to pick me up. I'm now using a walker to get around.

Dora Lee: We get home, I'm doing good to make it to the bathroom and he wants to know if I'm up to cooking dinner. No you stupid fuck! I was at the doctor every 2 weeks doing spinal injections and I'm on hydrocodine. Dennis (Denny) doles them out to me. He claimed that they were highly addictive.

Dora Lee: But I seem to be constantly running out of them. He would yell at me because I'm out of medication, Denny demanded that my doctor needed to give me more of them. Well the insurance will only pay for narcotics every 2 weeks. He would yell at me because someone was calling him a fraud or a liar.

Dora Lee: During this entire time, a lady kept calling the house at all hours of the night. He said she was having issues, that he was counseling her, and that he has this clock running. He sounded like he was getting paid for his services for being a counselor. I said, "Than why are you going out to your car to talk to her". His BS story. He claimed that it was doctor patient confidentiality. That's another story how all that went down.

Dora Lee: A few months later they figure out, after many tests, that they needed to remove the discs in my back and fuse my spine. What does Denny do? He schedules a CHL class the day of my surgery. He walks me in, shows his face, and said I need to get back to him. He gives the phone number to the nurse and says, "Call when she is out". My surgery lasts 8 hours, and 2 pints of blood later I'm in worst pain possible. I've got rods and screws holding my back together now. I'm talking, I have high tolerance for pain... Morphine... What morphine, that's like water...

Dora Lee: Where is Dennis for moral support? No clue... He finds out that the ex-wives are coming to see me with his kids... He trots his happy ass back up to the hospital, then leaves when they do. I get transferred to a rehab... No Dennis... Ex-wives coming to see current wife with kids... Here he comes again... I'm in rehab, I had to schedule with him as to when he can bring the car up so they can teach me how to get in and out of the car. I had to learn how to transfer myself from a wheelchair to his car.

Dora Lee: Tell me, for a guy that does not work, why the hell do I have to make an appointment? I finally get home, I have a nurse that sees me every other day, and physical therapy comes to see me every other day. So someone is in the house every day. Omg... The wrath... how dare they check up on him!

I'm an invalid and cannot even make it to the damn toilet or the shower, the nurse helped me do those things. I cannot even pick up anything over 8 ounces! He was so jealous I was getting all the attention! Wanna know what he fed me? A TV dinner that he could throw into the microwave. Half the time I couldn't eat.

Dora Lee: I know I'm ranting.. But I'm sure most of you men, if your wife is having major back surgery... You would sit in the waiting room during your free time, or make arrangements with your work in order to be with your wife while she's getting operated on. Absent that, you'd come up after work, you do something out of concern. Not Dennis (Denny) Chevalier... I'm glad he wasn't there... But he could've showed a little concern...

Dora Lee: I was not allowed to lift anything heavier than 8 oz. He took his guns with him when he went on his supposed weekend guard duty.

Did he tell you I was in the hospital for 2 weeks when I had major back surgery? I couldn't make it to the toilet nor to the shower, they fused my lower spine and I have rods and screws holding my back together.

I wasn't allowed to lift anything heavier than 8 oz. He brings me home. He's pissed off because my doctor wanted me to have home health care. He bitched me out.

Dora Lee: Because he was worried that they were checking up on him and on how he was taking care of me.

How did he take care of me? I was home for 2 days, he had supposed MEMS training for 4 days. Left me at home with no food. Some people have staples... Like cans of corn or peas, you know the food you buy and never get to it, I didn't have shit.

Dora Lee: He leaves me alone for 4 days because of his MEMS training was "so important".

I didn't even have money in the checking account to buy pizza. He even took all the miscellaneous change. He took my pain meds, he figured out how many I should be allowed for 4 days and took the rest with him. I was having to call my doctor every week to have her refill my meds, because he was taking them. He was screaming and yelling at me because the insurance will only pay for narcotics every 2 weeks and fill it.

Dora Lee: He was yelling at me because of home health, they were invading our house. How dare they check up on him! He was telling everyone that the narcotics was making me crazy. That it was causing me to be bi polar. How could it? He hid the narcotics and doled out what I was allowed. Do the math, I was allowed 2 every 4 hours. I slept 12 of the 24 hours... And my doctor was giving me 120 every 2 weeks! I should be dead from drug over dose!

Dennis (Denny) Chevalier Assaults His Ex-Wife in the Areas She Had Surgery on -- an Interview

Hans Fallada: What about fidelity? Did he at least stay loyal to you?

Dora Lee: On Mother's Day, he buys her flowers, with my freaking money!! He acts like he makes all this money... it was my money... I said if I'm buying this woman flowers, I could at least have fucked her so I felt I got something out of the deal! Omg... hell was to be paid for that comment.

Dora Lee: She told me there were pictures of the 2 of them on his phone! I made him unlock his phone and hand it to me because he kept saying we were both crazy and never to question his veracity. He has always been faithful.

I said, "If that's the case you have nothing to hide give me your phone!" I went right to the pictures and he ripped the phone out of my hand, we immediately got into a fight. Remember, I've got serious back issues. He grabbed me from behind and put his knee on my lower back while wrapping his arm around my neck in a choke hold.

I'm 5'4 he is 6'1 and outweigh me by 300lbs. He slammed me into the wall and I wasn't thinking of my back injury I was so pissed off... no man will ever hit me! I kicked him in his groin, he let me go. I called the cops! He sweet talked himself from getting arrested that night!

Ex-Wife "A" of 6: He never hit me, he threw things but never at me. He would get up in my face or back me up to a wall and try to intimidate me a few times. He knew the consequences of hitting me.

Hans Fallada: Why didn't he commit domestic violence on you? 

Ex-Wife "A" of 6: My XXXX was a XXXX...my XXXX knew people too. Dennis knew better than to hit me.

Hans Fallada: Meaning, Dennis (Denny) Chevalier is a habitual perpetrator of domestic violence.

Dennis (Denny) Chevalier Pointed His Gun at His Ex-Wife and Son -- an Interview

Hans Fallada: Dora Lee, on This Ain't Hell, you talked about him creating dating profiles during your relationship. Did he take those down? 

Dora Lee: He said, "I keep taking them down but someone keeps putting them back up!" Hmmm, I wonder who that could be!

Hans Fallada: Dennis (Denny) Chevalier appears like a violent man, has anybody gotten the police involved with his domestic violence episodes?

Dora Lee: I kept questioning him on why his son, who is 16 years old, would need his mother to stay with him when he would visit. I did not know at the time, the divorce decree states Dennis (Denny) Chevalier's visitation has to be supervised due to the fact he held a gun on his ex-wife and his son.

Johannes Hans Fallada: How was Dennis Howard Chevalier with employment? 

Dora Lee: He was working as an adjunct professor at CTU when we first got together. He was also doing his private investigator stuff. As soon as we started living together, I noticed he was having issues with students. He was under contract with them. I believe we got married and boom within the first month he loses his job at the school. Boom... he loses his job at the PI firm. He had 1 other job with another PI firm that lasted a month. Rest of the time, he sat at home saying that the economy was bad, that he could not find a job. I was working 12 hour days...

Dora Lee: Regards to his business, Chevalier and Associates, I wanna know who the associates are because the entire time I was with him there was no one but him.

Dora Lee: To fill in the gaps of his unemployment he states that he worked for himself. He wasn't working. He was sitting at home in front of the computer doing god knows what.

Dora Lee: What scared me to death was he wanted to open up a checking together and I went along with it. He said that's our savings for our wedding. So I'm putting in money all the time thinking it's our savings account. I look and he is using the money. He said he got confused as to which checking he was using. His next excuse, we need to replace our stuff with new stuff. He kept asking for money, he said he will pay me back when he got paid. That never happened.

HorseshoesandHandgrenades: He was working for a security company doing night shift and had had several "arrests" and altercations with bad guys before Christmas, all while still in the Texas State Guard.

Dennis (Denny) Howard Chevalier Just Had Gastric Surgery, Eats a Hamburger Soon After Surgery -- an Interview

Hans Fallada: Did you have an opportunity to talk to other women that have met Dennis Howard Chevalier?

Dora Lee: His next wife married him the longest, she has her masters in psychology. So I guess that's how she put up with him for over 10 years until she wanted to leave. He went crazy and pulled a gun out... he used the excuse the medication from the cancer drove him crazy.

Dora Lee: The first time I got to be alone with Sharon was when Dennis (Denny) Chevalier was in the hospital for the millionth time. We sat in the lobby where she told me that his PhD was not real, that he was never in the Air Force and the reason why she is there all the time is because their son is terrified of his dad.

She said she tried to leave and he pulled a gun on them. She said she was doing the same thing driving over 50 miles to go get Bryan so he can see his dad, Dennis never put forth any effort. She said due to finances she couldn't go get him all the time.

Sharon said Dennis blames her for keeping Bryan away from him.

Sharon also made a comment, she wondered if Dennis was harming himself to get attention. She said she wouldn't put it past him. When I finally spoke to Sharon for the first time, this was Dennis' s 4th or 5th time being in the hospital in less than 4 months. They would get him straightened out. He would be back in. It got so bad the ER doctor was asking him if he was harming himself.

I was taking so much time off work to take care of him that I had to go out on family leave.

Hans Fallada: Could you give me an example of something he did to get that extra attention?

Dora Lee: His gastric bypass, was a fucking nightmare... His thinking is warped!

He has the gastric sleeve, was in the hospital for a week, he gets home... What's he do? Eats an entire hamburger... Dumbass the stitches haven't healed, only liquid for you! I jumped all over his ass! Forgot his excuse... Another time I was like, "You sure you should be eating that?" He said, "Well I want to see how much food I can eat before I puke!" WTF!

So, what happens, he destroys the stitching on his stomach, it adheres to his spleen, all the gastric juices ended up in the spleen and creates this horrid infection, he ends up septic... Almost killed him. He spends a month in ICU. Another 6 months walking around with a port with antibiotics, going in him 24/7. All because he wanted to see how much his stomach can hold so he can puke... FIGURE THAT SHIT OUT... I NEVER COULD...

Hans Fallada: Did Dennis (Denny) Howard Chevalier ever see how he caused you grief?

Dora Lee: The amount of stress Dennis put me through with the "gas lighting" yes, I did go to a psychologist, first time my shrink met him, she said, "I don't say this to many of my clients, but you need to leave him before he kills you". She gave me numbers to women's shelters, the first chance I got I ran.

Hans Fallada: Dennis Howard Chevalier claims that you're bipolar. I take it that this is another one of his elaborate stories...

Dora Lee: I've absolutely had it with the shit he is going around telling people that I'm bi polar and I refuse to take my medication. If I'm so god damn bi polar how am I to hold down a job for 15 years where he hasn't held down a job more than a month? If I was lucky, it was 2 months!

Dora Lee: He was constantly trying to convince me I was bat shit crazy. One day he sat me down to convince me that I didn't know how to articulate myself. I said, "If I didn't know how to get my point across my employer would have fired me a long time ago".

Ex-Wife "A" of 6: Well, being married to him could be a contributing factor...LOL JK. He has to blame someone for his failures.

Hans Fallada: The folks at This Ain't Hell identify Dennis Howard Chevalier as thinking that it's all about him. Your take? 

Dora Lee: Boy he loves attention! He has been in the hospital for one medical issue after another! I'm like no one can have the amount of issues he can have, even the hospital was asking if he was harming himself.

Dennis (Denny) Howard Chevalier Ate a 7 Pound Block Cheese in One Night -- An Interview

Hans Fallada: Did he live up to the stereotype of "fat and lazy"? 

Dora Lee: He was so damn lazy he opened up a can leave it on the counter and couldn't walk 2 feet to put it in the trash. Seriously guys. I was spending $500.00 to 600.00 in groceries a week, and it was the 2 of us!!! I was never home to eat the shit. I bought a 7lb bag of cheese and grapes for my breakfast, which should have lasted me 2 weeks! I said, "Do not eat!" I get up the next morning, gone!! 7 pounds of fucking cheese! Who the fuck eats 7 pounds of cheese over night and doesn't remember?

Johannes Hans Fallada: Were you surprised by the news that Dennis Howard Chevalier never was in the Air Force, never flew C130s, never flew combat missions into Iraq during the Gulf War, and was never a USAF LTC? 

Dora Lee: I was mad when I discovered Dennis posting shit about me on the internet, that's how I found this site when I googled him. I got pissed off again when I found out his DD 214 was a fake.

Hans Fallada: Could you tell us about the end of your marriage to Dennis Howard Chevalier? 

Dora Lee: I lived with this douche bag for 2 years, he almost killed me. I escaped with my life... I made it out with my life! I saw the signs, but I was single for 10 years... didn't want to be alone anymore. I learned a lot about myself.

Dennis (Denny) Chevalier Caught Spiking His Fiancés Drink with Valium- an Interview

Dennis (Denny) Howard Chevalier received his "PhD" from Kennedy Western, a non accredited diploma mill. After he received that phony diploma, he purchased this white smock and tried to play into his new "Doc Chevey" persona. 

Hans Fallada: Dora Lee, what would you tell any woman reading this, wondering if they should go into a relationship with Dennis (Denny) Chevalier? 

Dora Lee: Honey rum while you can, because if you don't believe all his BS, than you too will be accused of being bi polar and need to be medicated!

Dora Lee: I had to run for my life because I believe he was giving me something and making me ill! I was so sick I was begging him to take me to the hospital and he refused! I was in horrific pain and on the floor and he would not take me. Said I'll get over it! I have no proof but speculation, because as soon as I left him I was doing better!

Linda Kay: Dennis (Denny) Chevalier spiked his ex-girlfriends/ex-wives drinks with Valium. He's not a doctor. Yet, he doesn't hesitate to misdiagnose someone's reactions to his attitude. All he had to do was change his attitude, and to quit being a "slave master."

He's the common denominator behind the "problems" he accused his ex-wives/ex-girlfriend's of having.

What's even worse, he didn't care about what kind of reactions that Valium would have on the other medication these women were required to take.

Dora Lee: Watch your money! He will say, "Let me pay these bills!" All your bills won't get paid, and he would buy bullshit stuff as your checking accounts keeps getting over drawn. And it's okay if he spends 1000′s on shit, however there is no money to buy yourself a pair of pants for work!

Hans Fallada: HorseshoesandHandgrenades, you were dating him briefly did you notice anything during that short period? 

I can understand everything fedupexwife is saying... But during our brief courtship, his side of the story was very believable. He made this sound like he was the victim and his 6 ex-wives were the perpetrators!!

After a conversation of his ex's and realizing he had been married 6 times previously, my gut started telling me to watch out.

He needed validation on just about everything he posted on Facebook. He got upset if I didn't "like" a comment. Any time he posted, he was ALWAYS the first to "like" it be it picture or comment.

He gave me his "resume" on our first meeting.

I know this isn't a dating forum but ladies BEWARE!! I did look him up and found exactly what he said he'd done, I couldn't find anything derogatory. Just what my gut was telling me.

He continued to email me when I chose not to continue dating him. I ended up threatening harassment if it continued.

Glad to have escaped (by the skin of my teeth) having found the This Ain't Hell forums on Dennis (Denny) Chevalier completely by accident.

Hans Fallada: Flyonthewall, you met them, what's your impression? 

I met "doc" via internet. Very personable, engaging fella. Had many interesting Facebook chats. I actually met Dennis Howard Chevalier and Dora Lee while on a training trip to Dallas-Fort Worth. Afterwards, somehow the entire relationship drama became SHTF.

She had serious back issues that required surgery. All of a sudden, HE starts with the paranoia drama. When I questioned one of his Facebook posts, he'd private mail me to rag me for daring to question his posting 'in public'. Shortly thereafter, he blocked and deleted me.

As a health care professional, I found his claims, for having a PhD in psychology, a real stretch. There is NO WAY he has a PhD in Psych. most doctoral professionals have lots of educational and training materials for referencing diagnoses. There was nothing of that sort in the house.

Johannes Hans Fallada: So there you go ladies. If you're reading this because you have done research on Dennis (Denny) Howard Chevalier, and you're debating whether or not to have a relationship with him... stay clear away from him!