Partygirl Would Slam the Door on Opportunity for Trivial Reasons

[qoute]partygirl » Mon Mar 05, 2012 3:53 pm
I can't imagine the horror of discovering he was my child's father. A girl would have better luck with the sperm from some random hook-up she found at a dive biker bar.[/quote]

Real women actually do their research about a potential sperm donor; instead judging them ill for refusing to cower and be bullied... for rightfully fighting Demand Studios Sucks zombies back.

This research includes a thorough look at the families' medical history; prior donor results; as well as recurring traits that keep showing up in the family. Other things that they look at? Link up opportunities for artificial insemination... or the ability to receive and send freeze containers through the mail.

What trait am I showing with these replies, which are causing you to express butthurt pain? That trait is my persistence. What's one common trait among those that succeed in life? Persistence maybe? Apparently, persistence is a negative trait in your eyes. You'd rather have someone that'll give up, and stay down when life knocks them down. Got you.

So, WalkAway, You've Worked Only One Day in March, and Zero in April? Based on Your Own Words, you Worked 1 day in two Months

"Well, I'm flattered that I was given my own post." - WalkAway

Get over yourself numbnuts, that was me firing back at you.

"To thebesig, since I know his dumb ass is reading this:" -- WalkAway

OK, dingdong, how else am I getting the comments that I'm responding to on this blog? Hint, I had to do something prior to responding to you guys... you know, like finding posts attacking me, then firing back maybe?

"I never saw your blog post until now. Why? Because I have a life. While you've been spending your days posting on your idiotic blog, I've been spending my days working. Work? I'm sure that's a foreign concept for you." -- WalkAway

Take it away WalkAway!

"lol. I'm just jealous he hasn't written anything bad about me" -- WalkAway

If I could use your words against you and make a liar out of you in the process, what makes you think that anything else you say is "believable"?

I could tell that you're pulling turd nuggets out of your arse as an emotional reaction. Why? Anybody with a fraction of a brain would look at the days on the calendar, compare that to the days I post on my blog, and know that you're full of it and don't know what you're talking about.

You wouldn't even need an advanced degree to see what I'm talking about. Just common sense, which you're seriously lacking.

Heck, how many days have I posted on this blog in April? How about March, which has 31 days? If one day, out of 31 days, constitutes "everyday," then you're dumber than a paramecium.

If you bothered to use your head, you'd look at the posting dates on my blog. You'd notice that I didn't spend "days" posting here. Perhaps your shortcomings, with your writing "career," with your employment, and with your life, stem from your failure to pay attention to detail.

I posted here on March 4. By your own words, that's the day that you worked. You didn't work for the rest of March, April, or any day up to the date of this series of posts.

Your posting history, on Demand Studios Sucks, makes a liar out of you. If you had a life, you wouldn't be posting away on DSS. You most certainly wouldn't have lost your composure over my blog posts. You definitely wouldn't have generated a butthurt post in response to me.

Also, I don't recall you standing right next to me, observing me. That's the qualification you'll need to determine, with accuracy, what I do with my time. If you pulled your head out of your arse, and did your research, you would've learned several facts... enough facts to cause you to post like an intelligent person and to keep you out of trouble.

According to "WalkAway's" insinuation, my two Decades of Military Service Mean Nothing

Work? I'm sure that's a foreign concept for you." -- WalkAway

Tell you what, until you have to drive on IED "avenue," in order to do your job, don't insinuate that I "don't" know what work is, where you "do." You've had the convenience of getting in a vehicle and driving/riding past a dead animal without flinching.

You've never had to go through a situation where the dummy driving backwards could very well be a suicide bomber operating a vehicle borne IED. You've never had to "pull evasive maneuvers" to make sure that your car doesn't go over a newly covered pothole... less whatever was under the "rework" blew up under your vehicle.

* Until you do a ground assault, at wee hours in the morning, full battle rattle and locked and loaded, don't tell me that "work" might be a foreign concept to me. If you were having dinner at the same time, there's a good chance that you were fully unaware of what I was doing... or of the fact that I was working while you were stuffing your face.

* Until you've had to react to small arms fire, don't tell me that you "work," then fart out of your arse about work being a foreign concept to me.

* Until you have to walk mile after mile, in your combat boots, with your M4 at the low ready prepared to swing it up to engage, with your battle rattle, and a 45+ pound ruck on your back, don't try to sell me the garbage that I "don't" know what work is... or even hint that you know what work is and that I "don't."

* Until you had to dig a hole in the ground just to take a dump, and go days without taking a shower, because that comes with the job, don't even try to fool anybody into thinking that you "work," and that "work" is a "foreign" concept to me.

* Until you had to sleep under the stars, for days, with your rifle/carbine at your side, spending a good chunk of that night taking nature in, because the job required it, don't try to fool people into thinking that work is an "alien" concept to me.

* Until you have to clean your weapon, because your life could depend on it within the next 24 hours... or even the next few minutes... don't try to hint to me that you work, and that I don't know what it is.

*Until you had to spend one holiday after another, and every weekend, and the days between them, doing military missions/duties because you're outside of the United States, don't tell me that work would be a "foreign" concept to me.

* Until you have to put up with one night after another getting mortared, don't you even try insinuating that I don't know what work is, but you do.

* Until you jack your body up after two decades of military service, don't even try with your assumptions that work is a "foreign" concept to me... where areas you "work." I'm feeling the results of decades of real work... pain felt doing simple things that you people take for granted... pain I'm willing to continue to endure to defend your freedom to make foot-in-your-mouth comments.

* Did you watch Blackhawk Down? Did you see those cool helicopters flying around? Well, I've ridden one of those over hostile territory you ding-dong. Even if I were to survive an attack on the Blackhawk I was riding, the fall would've made it a "consummatum est" moment for me. One thing for sure, I'd be a hell of a lot safer, and comfortable, doing your "job."

* Hey, what do you think of the idea of getting up at the arse crack of dawn, just to do at least an hour of battle focused physical fitness before the sun comes up? What? Your job doesn't require you to do that? I thought so. But that'd be understandable. I wouldn't be surprised if you didn't need to be in top physical condition to do your "job."

* There's a very good chance that while you were sitting in the comforts of your home, protected from the elements with your atmosphere control, I was downrange, outside, not far from a bunch of people that wanted to end my comrades, and my life, via AK-47, IED or RPG. I wouldn't be surprised if you had the convenience and comfort of not having to worry about that at your "job."

The only thing "foreign" about that and most the events that I mentioned above, is the fact that most took place in a foreign country. What part of your job compares? You probably couldn't answer that because unlike you, I have a job, and there's nothing foreign about the concept of work to me.

Simple body motions, that you probably overlook, remind me of that fact.

You see, "WalkAway," until you've walked miles in MY boots, seen what I've seen, done what I've done, you don't have a leg to stand on when trying to insinuate that work is a "foreign" concept for me, or that you even work at all.

Disagree with my comparisons? Perhaps you could walk up to a family, mourning their fallen at a national cemetery, and tell them that working was a "foreign" concept to their loved one.

No, you don't have to thank me, as I'm not like you. If you can't walk away from a fight that you've lost before you started, "WalkAway," the least that you could do is to simply sit down, shut up, and quit damaging your cause even further.  

HINT: Screw your head back on before suggesting to a service member that work is a "foreign" concept to him/her. By even making that suggestion, you dishonor anybody that has ever served in uniform. You'll lose any contest that results from that.

After this part of my reply... if you can't figure out why I think you're a retard, you're hurting.

Generating These Posts Constitutes a Small Fraction of my Time

"With how much time you apparently spend reading a forum that you were banned from several months back, and with how much time you spend spinning everything that is said on here to fit your own, twisted mind, well, it becomes clear that you must have a lot of free time on your hands." -  WalkAway

WRONG.

Again, it doesn't take me long to generate these posts. I don't spend all day doing them. I do these series of posts piece-meal, generating my replies on MS Word then moving on. By the time I finally make those posts, day's have gone by since I've finished typing them. In this case, weeks.

The time I spend on them, the days I do work on them, is a small insignificant fraction of my total day. Remember, I've been doing this since 2003. I've got this down to a science.

You even ignored obvious facts. But again, that's proof that I got to you. Any tard reacting under pure emotion would "fire back" driven by that emotion. That retard will ignore obvious facts. For instance, look at the dates for my blog posts.

As you can see, I don't post here everyday. Contrary to what you farted out, I do have a life. I don't spend it posting on blogs and message boards, like what you're doing. The fact that I have other commitments prevents me from doing what you do on a regular basis. I have to do this "piece meal," a little at a time as my schedule permits.

Let's sum this up.

* It doesn't take me long to read DSS zombie rants and raves. I'm a speed reader.

* Second, it doesn't take long for me to type my responses. I'm a speed typist. I don't even need to look at the keyboard to type.

* Third, I also use Speech to Text, which speeds my writing work up.

Meaning... It doesn't take me long to read you people's garbage, then generate a reply.

Don't mistake my telling it like it is, about you retards, as me "spinning" anything. Human nature doesn't change from one message board to another. You people are no different from the retards that I've debated against over the past few years. Your attitudes, reactions, and emotions don't change.

You DMS zombies are repeating the same actions, and responses, that previous retards have made. All I'm doing is looking at that repeated pattern, and calling it like I see it. This would be like saying that the "current" hurricane system would move in a northeast direction, because every hurricane that has hit this area so far moved northeastward.

Instead of dismissing my calling-it-like-I-see-it comments, you need to take a good hard look at yourself... without your horse-blinders on, and without your ego getting into the way.

"thebesig, here's a tip: when a forum bans you, it's time to move the fuck on to somewhere else."  - WalkAway

WRONG Again.

What part of, "Even if I don't get back with you tonight, tomorrow, the next week, month, year or decade, I will get back to you. My replying to you guys is almost as guaranteed as death and taxes," didn't you understand? Are you THAT retarded, or are you simply incapable of understanding simple English?

Let me spell this out to you, ding dong. I treat online exchanges like a combat operation. I won't "cease fire" on someone unless they quit firing in my direction. If a retard fires in my direction, I'm going to fire back... and will continue to fire back until that retard is neutralized.

Want me to stop firing on you retards? Don't give me an excuse to mention you. You do that by ignoring me. Again: Let your butthurt post about me be "X." Let my response to your butthurt post be "Y." If "X" then "Y." If not "X," then not "Y."

How about that? Ignore me and the problem solves itself. THAT'S how you settle this. You don't fire in my direction, then tell me to "move the fuck on." That's not how things work. The way it works is if you want me to stop, you'll stop taking swipes at me.

This isn't rocket science, it's simple common sense.

I take sadistic pleasure in dismantling you people's argument and credibility. You obviously have a problem with it. You could only influence things on your end.

"Sticking around at a forum you've been banned " - WalkAway

So says the ding dong that didn't stop himself from reading my blog after the fact.

"and stalking a respected member such as Page" -- WalkAway

You're basing that on? I thought so, you're just pulling turd nuggets out of your arse.

You see, if you didn't go on an emotional rant after seeing my blog, you would've noticed that I addressed people that attacked me... directly and indirectly. That's not exactly "stalking" by any stretch of the imagination.

" makes you appear to be out of your right mind and possibly even a huge danger to society" -- WalkAway

Get over yourself retard, this doesn't have anything to do with society's well being. The real issue, that drove you to say that, is my refusal to give up. Heaven forbid that the person that you chose to "bully" fights back, and refuses to back down.

You're not used to that, aren't you, bully? Don't mistake my refusing to let your BS stand as my being "out of my mind." That's some nonsense clap trap that a retard with control issues would say.

" believe me, I've seen crazy people before, so I think I know what I'm talking about." -- WalkAway

Believe me, I've talked to psychiatrists as part of my pre and post deployment screening. Since none of them agreed with your opinion, it's painfully obvious that you don't know what you're talking about... you're just pulling turd nuggets out of your arse.

Who should we believe, people who've met me, or you, who've never met me?

Hint: It helps to know the facts about me before you could hope to come close to being "correct" about what you say about me. I'm hoping that your marksmanship isn't anywhere near to being like your attempts to guess things about me. If it were, I'd hate to be the person standing behind you as you try to shoot the target in front of you.

" And you're donating sperm? I wonder if the clinic you donate at (and its clients) know that you're a crazy fucker. If they did, no way would they be using your sperm." -- WalkAway

Fortunately for me, only intelligent people get involved with artificial inseminations. Intelligent people handle this by looking at family medical history, family traits, and track record with successful inseminations.

Meaning, you're not that intelligent, aren't you? I wouldn't be surprised if all you could come up with is a drizzle every time you're required to brainstorm something.

Through your emotional knee jerk reaction, you missed one of the qualifiers that donor recipients look for. Read up on as many successful people as you could read up on. You'll find that one of the common traits they share is persistence.

Beyond all your belly-aching and butt-hurting, your true problem with me is that I'm persistent with hitting you guys back.

"Thanks for giving society a whole new generation of psychopaths, jackass." -- WalkAway

Let's see, the military didn't see me as a psychopath. Neither did any of the psychiatrists that have talked to me. What do the military, and these psychiatrists have, that the above butt muncher doesn't?

Answer, they've met me face to face, and are qualified to talk about my psychological state. This butt muncher, on the other hand, is just spewing the crap that it chewed on while butt munching one of the other DSS posters.

"Also, the idea that I suck Page's ass is laughable." -- WalkAway

As much crap that you just spewed, that concept isn't laughable. In fact, it wouldn't surprise me if you fantasized having one of the DSS women sit on your mouth while you indulged in your apparent butt munching fetish.

I guess if they were to take your access to arse away, you'd go silent.

" Just today she and I had a disagreement of something I posted in another thread." -- WalkAway

Let me lead you by the fingers here...

Go back to the post that you're belly aching over. Now, look at the posting date. Do you see it? Need help finding it? Do you need help reading the date? Now, notice how I'm addressing something you said weeks ago, rather than "after" you "disagreed" with Page1News?

Or, did you honest to God expect me to foresee your disagreement, weeks or months down the road?

What you just spewed, you retard, is what's called a strawman argument.

"I respect her, yes (just as I do many other members here)," -- WalkAway

This isn't a case where you can respect some, but not others. Since you're not afraid to disrespect veterans by insinuating that I "don't" have a job, how much you respect others on DSS doesn't mean anything.

"but I'm not afraid to speak my mind to anyone here if I disagree with them." -- WalkAway

Yet, you have a problem with someone telling it like it is with regards to your retarded arse and the rest of your cohorts... you also have problems with anyone that's not afraid to fire back at you retards ad infinitum... Got you.

"Here's hoping you grow the fuck up and move on from stalking DSS'ers, thebesig." -- WalkAway

Do you want to know how ridiculous that sounds?

Tell you what, if someone walks up to you, and knocks you on the arse, resist the urge to fight back. Remember, fighting back isn't the "grown up" thing to do. If you do strike back, tell yourself that you need to grow the "f" up and move on from the scene.

Just take those punches and move on without retaliating.

Here's the cold hard reality. Bowing down and keeling over for you doesn't constitute "growing up." Laying on one's back, and turning one's belly up for you people's abuse isn't "growing up." Laying down and letting you walk all over me doesn't constitute "growing up."

If by "growing up," you mean that I let you people's BS stand unchallenged, I'm sorry. You're going to be in for a major disappointment.

Also, don't mistake my giving you people a taste of your medicine as my "stalking" you DSS zombies.

Here's how things actually work.

A retard DSS zombie fires in my direction, I fire back. Let me simplify this for you. X = F*tard DSS zombies spew crap about me. Y = I fact check said F*tard DSS zombies. If "X," then "Y." Now, for the solution: If not "X," then not "Y."

You want all of this to stop? Address the cause, urge the F*tard DSS zombies addressing me to stop. If you can't do that, you need to ask for a username change. Your current one obviously wouldn't fit you.

I have every intention of firing back at you guys for as long as you keep up with your crap... no matter how long this back and forth takes place. Want this to end? Ignore me and don't give me an excuse to fire back. It's THAT simple. Again, this isn't rocket science; it's simple common sense.

Justbrowsing Isn't Browsing; He's Just Farting...

 [quote]Justbrowsing » Mon Mar 05, 2012 6:29 pm
So all this ranting is about a little bit of butthurt? That's disappointing.[/quote]

"That's disappointing," is something that your parents thought while they watched you "grow." What you're trying to describe is a massive fact check operation. Butthurt? Not even remotely close. A counter argument to you retards' drivel? Absolutely.

DSS' WalkAway Refuses to Walk Away, he Needs Another Username

[quote] WalkAway » Mon Mar 05, 2012 6:52 pm

Lol, well, besig is certainly crazy enough to be a stalker. [/quote]

LOL, well, you certainly post as if a retarded ghost possesses you!

DSS' Berg's Comments Casts More Doubt on her Degree Claims...

"LOL, I left that post on his blog on February 22nd. It literally took 5 minutes. I told Despicable that he would get butthurt, little did I know it would be such an epic explosion. He must have salivated over his response for weeks." - berg » Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:35 pm

Wrong on all counts.

First, you're pulling crap out of your arse about how long it took me to reply to your drivel. Hint, it didn't take weeks, not by a long shot. It took me less than 10 minutes to generate my entire reply to you. And guess what? I had that reply prepared within 24 hours of you generating your drivel.

Unlike you, I have real world commitments that I have to tend to. Consequently, I have to work on my replies one part at a time. Only an idiot would assume that I "salivated" over the response "for weeks."

Second, are you that retarded that you're going to dismiss a simple fact-check as a "butthurt"? Baghdad Bob? Is that you? If you meant that I was going to respond, that's a given. If people haven't figured that out yet, they're beyond stupid.

"Anyway, I win." - berg

Wrong again. You lost this exchange before it began. You win a debate by advancing facts, reason and logic. All you did was advance a phony, emotional "different levels" kumbaya clap trap. You failed to prove me wrong, or you right, about anything.

"Oh, and Besig, my dissertation was several performances and the memorization of hundreds of classical pieces." - berg

I call BS, you don't have any degree. This represents a shift from your last comment. You still don't get excused from the reading comprehension department. Or, do you think you're exempt from being able to read? Not by a long shot.

Reading comprehension is easier than memorizing. I refuse to believe that you could do the latter while failing miserably at the former.

"I don't need to read." - berg

So says the the tard that claims that she went to three good schools. That should have read, "I don't wanna read!"

"And, I have a DMA, not a Ph.D." - berg

What I also said:

"Demand Studios Sucks Berg's Reading Abilities Doesn't Match her Doctorate Claims" - WC

When I said, "Doctorate," I was talking about doctor level degrees. Do keep tap dancing Skippy. Your claims still don't match your performance.

"Thank you truly for getting so butthurt over this." - berg

Don't mistake my fact checking you, to include attacking your phony claims, as my being "butthurt." Your statement has as much validity as Baghdad Bob's claiming the there were "no" US troops in Baghdad. Trying to take credit for "predicting" that I'll reply is like trying to take credit for predicting that the sun will rise tomorrow.

"It literally made my day. I'm sure this post will spawn additional entertainment for me as well." - berg

No it didn't. The reality? It annoys the crap out of you when I keep stomping your dick into the ground. You made that comment more out of denial than you did out of joy.

The only person, between the two of us, that's getting any joy out of this is me. I take sadistic pleasure with destroying you assclowns' drivels.

Gary Needs to Advice the Other DSS Zombies to Take the Right Course of Action

 [quote]Gary Busey for CE » Mon Mar 05, 2012 10:18 pm
Here is my advice for the poor man...[/quote]

If it doesn't involve stomping DSS zombie faces into their own BS, you're just wasting your time.

Common Sense and Reading Comprehension are Foreign Concepts to BurnCEs

[quote]by BurnCEs » Tue Mar 06, 2012 3:10 am

You can tell from the social alienation in his posts that the idea of collegiate agreement and friendship is a foreign concept toThebesig. Hell, I expect even the band of brothers in his latrine-digging unit in Da Army used to nightly pray that the Eyeraqis would use his nipples as target practise to shut him the fuck up.[/quote]

I could tell that reading comprehension and common sense are foreign concepts to you.

First, it's plainly obvious that I'm countering the drivel of the retard DSS zombies that are whining about something that I said. This isn't "social alienation," as you rejects don't define what the social norm is. You guys don't even represent mainstream society.

Second, berg and I aren't exactly agreeing with each other's main point, or stance. Not exactly an environment for "collegiate agreement." Anybody that has at least a 6th grade education level would know that there are things that people won't agree on, and things that people will agree on. When it comes to the former, you're not going to get "collegiate agreement." That happens with the later, or something close to it.

You people aren't taking friendly actions toward me, so you don't have a leg to stand on when talking about friendship being a "foreign" concept. I don't befriend people that attack me. I consider them hostiles and I fire back accordingly.

My point still stands. When it comes to two opposing arguments, a Saxon style engagement is an effective vetting tool. The stronger argument stands. The weaker argument requires retooling and rethinking.

Third, there's no "latrine-digging" unit in the Army you numbnuts. Digging fighting positions, as well as digging latrines, is a basic soldiering skill... regardless of what MOS you hold.

Fourth, if you knew anything about the Improved Outer Tactical Vest, or IOTV, you'd know that your hoped for target would be covered.

Fifth, it's painfully obvious that you're clueless about military culture, to include how we interact with each other and others. If you did, you'd realize that my tone, demeanor, persistence, and what I say... in response to you people's BS... is consistent with what others with my military background would do.

You wouldn't have faired better with other veterans who've been around for a while. Soldiers that acted like you, and the other DSS zombies that I'm smacking around, usually got the dog crap smoked out of them every day. We've got no patience for stupidity and BS.

You have issues with my refusing to "shut up"? You're making this sound like I'm going out of my way to trouble you people. So let me break this down for you "brain." These posts are reactive in nature. Meaning, they're highly dependent on your actions. Want me to "shut up"? Don't give me an excuse NOT TO by giving me something to respond to.

It's THAT simple.

Demand Studios Sucks Berg's Reading Abilities Doesn't Match her Doctorate Claims

[quote]Originally posted by berg

Hello there, Thebesig! How thoughtful of you to provide me with career advice. Lol, you are correct, they still call it Poly Sci.

You may be asking yourself, what brings me to this side of the forest on this fine evening. Well, my dear friend, I shall tell you.[/quote]

You've gone to three "good" schools, "have a doctorate," yet can't tell the difference between first and third persons? Knowing the difference would've let you know whether I was talking to you or not... and whether I was specifically giving you any advice or not:

"Advertising? Perhaps 'berg' could get in touch with a marketer or a publisher with a mailing list that spans the English speaking world. If she does well doing their 'inserts,' or other small writing project, she'll get a shot at earning over $1,500.00 writing a mailing package. If she writes something that beats their control letter, she's looking at earning more than that for a follow on assignment." -- WC

Since your "Ph.D" level of reading missed this, let me spell this out to you. That statement is in the same family as the rhetorical question. A rhetorical question isn't asked to get an answer, but to help make a point. That quoted statement works the same way. It's intended to make a point, while speaking about you in the third person.

That wasn't me telling you what you should do. That was me making a point, to counter your claims that business and advertising are "pussy majors." That wasn't me giving you career advice.

Also, an "insert" is a direct mail piece that you'd find in a magazine or newspaper. These are the cards and fliers that tend to fall to the floor when you're looking at a magazine. These cards are either subscription renewals, or new subscription requests. You mail these "inserts" to the publisher to start, or renew, your subscription.

When I said, "doing their inserts," I meant writing the material on those cards that'll motivate a person to send the card to the publisher. Publishers will see how you do on something small before trusting you with something big.

If you read that statement in context, you'd notice that this has everything to do with writing... and nothing to do with "stuffing" envelopes, as your "doctorate" level reading misinterpreted.

And no, I didn't ask myself why you responded. I saw notification that you posted to one of the blog entries. The initial impression I had was that you posted under your username, unlike the cowards that hide behind an anonymous name.

DSS' Berg Interprets Opinion Based Degrees as Mentally Challenging over Practical Degrees

[quote]Originally posted by berg

You see, I don't know where you went to college, and I can't be bothered to investigate that. But, I can tell you that if you went to a good school, or three of them as I did, you would understand why Advertising and Business are considered soft degrees. That is just a fact, you can't argue with that, they are soft degrees. So, in a nutshell, that is why I call them pussy degrees. There is nothing mentally challenging about a Business or Advertising degree. An MBA, sure, that is a challenge.[/quote]

Don't mistake your opinion, as to what makes a hard degree or a soft one, as that one that resulted from having gone to a "good" school.

I don't recall using "soft" or "hard" to describe degrees when I started out. We had multiple categories to describe the different degrees. We didn't use "soft" or "hard" to describe them.

We used terms like "black and white" and "grey." The "black and white" were the hard sciences... your engineering, mathematics and science degrees. Business, teaching, hospitality, etc, were in a class of their own.

Then we had the grey classes... which described political science, philosophy, and other courses that hinged heavily on opinion. We also had "liberal arts," which encompassed a combination of academic disciplines.

We also used the terms "useful," and "useless." Useful resulted in a measurable skill that you could apply in the real world. This incorporated black and white courses, as well as courses that built into a regular profession... like business, journalism, and teaching.

We also staggered them as follows: Math, Science, Engineering, etc, at the top; Business, journalism, etc in the middle; and the grey courses at the bottom.

Based on your comments, about the above degrees, I doubt that you attempted to complete a Business, or Advertising course... unless it was an introductory course. If that was your only exposure, then you're still not qualified to judge those degrees.

You argue that "challenging the mind" should be a criteria.

That arrogantly assumes that those that didn't follow your path didn't challenge their minds. That also arrogantly assumes that those that didn't go to a university failed to "challenge their minds." You don't need a university experience to challenge your mind. People could still do intellectually challenging activities without matriculating into a university, or enrolling in a course.

If an academic discipline challenged you, but not someone else, that's not a reflection of the university they went to. That's a reflection of where each person's interests fall. It's also a reflection of aptitude for a certain subject.

Subjects that cause people to have to work their brains may not require any brain power from another person.

Berg Tries to De-Emphasize Practical Degrees While Emphasizing Opinion Degrees

[quote] Originally posted by berg

You and I are not talking on the same level. Where you see a useless degree as something that will "improve their chances of learning a useful skill to use in the real world," I see a useless degree as something that doesn't challenge the mind, and provide you with questions that will challenge you the rest of your life.[/quote]

There's no, "we're on different levels about this." You pointed out one glaring difference between us. I'm realistic, you're idealistic. I see things from the real world standpoint; you see things from an academic bubble standpoint.

If you needed a degree to "challenge the mind," then you're hurting. If you needed a university experience to give you something that challenges you for the rest of your life, then you're hurting.

I've been challenging my mind long before I took my first college level course in high school. Other people, who've never been to college, pursue interests that allow them to challenge their minds. They ask one question, they seek the answer, which leads to other questions, which leads to the cycle repeating itself for the rest of the person's life.

Many didn't need a college education, or college degree, to do this. Most people have some kind of interest... and mind challenging activity... that they're going to ponder and consider for the rest of their lives. Most of these people have never matriculated into a university.

Maybe you could go up to a soldier digging a machine gun defense position. You could tell him that since digging fox holes "doesn't challenge the mind" like your "good schools" did, that what he's doing is a "pussy" activity. Maybe you could grab the entrenching tool from him and show him how his job is a "pussy" job.

[quote]Originally posted by berg

Sure, some people may find joy and fulfillment in advertising, but you are better off getting a degree in media or psychology. Those degrees will actually teach you something.[/quote]

This narrow view about the different degrees argues against the idea that you've "got" a "doctorate" degree.

By the time most college students settle on a degree, they've done so with two main variables. One, they have a strong interest in the discipline that they're pursuing. This includes having joy and fulfillment.

Two, they see themselves as having the aptitude for the discipline, as well as a good chance of using that discipline to secure a related job in the real world. Aptitude plays a large role in how much a student will pick up and learn. Without that aptitude, there's so much knowledge that's not going to stick.

You Need to Know Humility Before you Talk About It

[quote]Originally posted by berg

I realize you took Poly Sci classes back in 1989. But, again, we aren't at the same level. You see, I went to top ranked schools. I know you didn't because you still have no humility and are far too confident in your mental abilities. I'm noticing a trend in your writing and opinions. It reminds me of Oscar Wilde's quote, in response to a cynic: "A man who knows the price of everything and the value of nothing."[/quote]

You need to show humility before you whine about other people not showing humility. Bragging about going to top ranked schools, to try to back your opinion, isn't humility. Trying to insinuate that your opinion is something that I'd hold if only I had also attended "top ranked schools," isn't you showing humility. That's arrogance.

"We're not at the same level," or, "We're on different planes," is nothing but feel good clap trap debate tactics. A school isn't a very good school if it teaches those kinds of debate tactics.

One of the main purposes of a university is to train students to gather, develop, and continue knowledge. Part of that involves an intellectual vetting process that's designed to develop knowledge, and eliminate "non" knowledge. This concept leads to how science, and other disciplines, are supposed to work and evolve.

You seek knowledge. Based on that knowledge, you develop an argument, or a theory. Once you have that argument, or theory, you test that theory to see if it's sound. If that theory fails, then you have to abandon it and go back to the drawing board. Again, this is a cycle that's designed to improve humankind's overall knowledge.

A vetting process is involved in developing that knowledge. It doesn't involve a touchy-feely-feel-good "different levels" argument. It involves a cold, hard, you're either right or wrong, Saxon style engagement. The former allows a person to hold onto a half baked theory. The later forces a person, with a weak argument, to reconsider his "data."

Again, your "good schools" aren't so "good" if they taught you that "different levels" crap.

Don't mistake my pursuing the facts, and arguing from the facts, as my being "far too" confident in my mental abilities. That's simply me telling it like it is in the same sense that I'd call a red fire hydrant a red fire hydrant.

Your observations of my writing and assessments, and the quote that you used, aren't even on the mark. If your marksmanship were like your comments about me, my traits, or abilities; I'd hate to be the person standing behind you as you try to shoot the target in front of you.

Berg Claims a Doctorate Degree, yet Fails to Understand Conversational English

[quote]Originally posted by berg

You may not be aware, but I have a doctorate. Heheh, it still makes me laugh when I say that. AneHow, I don't write for Demand anymore, and I don't need your advice on becoming an envelope licker. So, please, next time you decide to quote me, try and find something more substantial that a two-line quip to latch onto.[/quote]

You do realize that you shot yourself... or rather, shot your doctorate claims... in the foot with that comment, do you?

Doctoral writing is jam packed with academic jargon, as well as with jargon associated with the academic discipline. It's written for an audience that predominantly holds doctoral degrees. It's also lengthy. You had to read one text after another with the same reading level.

My blog entry wasn't written anywhere near the doctoral level. It was written for someone that has at least a grade school level understanding of the English language.

So, having read doctoral level writing, there's no way that you would've missed the mark when it came to understanding what I wrote. Where, in the blog entry that you replied to, does it say anything about licking envelopes?

Perhaps you misinterpreted me when you said this:

"You have to know something about advertising; as in direct mail/direct response advertising." -- WC

Direct mail: Advertising that calls for a prospect to "respond" to the mailing package... as in place an order. That's not calling for the prospect to "lick an envelope," as your "doctorate" trained chrome dome had misinterpreted it.

What? That's not what you were referencing?

Then perhaps your "doctorate" trained mind, with its "doctorate" level reading "comprehension abilities," could quote the section in the blog post mentioning "envelope licking." I couldn't find it, and neither could the "Control F" function on my keyboard.

Also, anything you say to counter me is ripe for the picking and dismantling. Even "if" you're not writing for Demand Media Studios, you're still posting on Demand Studios Sucks.

"I'm fulfilled, I am doing what I love and teaching in a university. I'm not a writer and I never was. I used Demand to get me through a one year period where I was looking for a new university teaching position. So, don't you worry about me." -- berg

I'm sorry, but I don't see you as a college professor. Most don't waste their time consistently posting on message boards and blogs. Every single one that I've interacted with has been far too busy juggling real world commitments. The Ph.D. holders were involved with research, generating papers on their studies, and fighting for grant money... leaving teaching assistants to do their teaching.

Many of them couldn't even be bothered to personally help their students.

There were professors that weren't into doing researches and making names for themselves. Many of these professors were still busy juggling real world responsibilities. None of them had time to post on message boards or to respond to blog entries, like what you're doing here.

"Now, if you have something more interesting to pick apart" -- berg

Any post that constitutes a debate against me is a perfect candidate to pick apart.

Berg Mistakes Her Opinion as Actual Knowledge, Complains About my "Lack" of Humility

[quote]Originally posted by berg

and have some actual knowledge of the subject, I am more than happy to stroll on over and see what's going down in ThebesIG land.

I'm glad I could grace you with my presence, I hope next time, you can choose something more substantial and worth picking apart.[/quote]

You call this "humility"? ROTFLMFAO! Take it away berg:

"You see, I went to top ranked schools. I know you didn't because you still have no humility and are far too confident in your mental abilities." -- berg

By your own definition, not only do you lack humility, you never went to a top ranked school.

Know when to break contact as a result of your losing the engagement; then we could talk about you having humility.

You need to present me with the facts before you try to brow beat me with your opinion about whether I'm knowledgeable on a subject or not. Your opinion doesn't count as hard fact, no matter how hard you try to connect it to your allegedly attending a "top ranked school."

You also need to try to use facts to back your point. It's painfully obvious that you're lacking in the fact department. It's also painfully obvious that you don't know what the hell you're talking about.

There's no way in hell that they'd award someone, with your lack of logic, with a doctorate degree.

If the "challenging the mind" and "different levels" clap traps are what's actually being taught, we're in trouble. If that were the case the quality of our university education in this country honest to God did deteriorate.

Again, any comment against mine is a perfect candidate to take apart.

A DSS Poster's Comment as Seen by a Critical Thinker Part II

[quote]Jeremy
February 21, 2012 at 5:22 am * Reply

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Hey! What about me! Everybody read my blog, which is a response to your blog and every post made here. I have a good traffic of crickets to my site, and Keeny Crwfish stops by every now and then to offer his qwality ritin' ProTips.

Oh: how ya'll like my beanie cap with the propellor on top? They wouldn't let me fly no mo' in Afghandamnistan because I kept wetting my military breeches. So I got this cool beanie as a consolation prize to help with my thumb-sucking.

Come see me any time, you meanies. I am at OneCrazyIlliterateFuck.blogspot.com
Time to fly: Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzooooooooom![/quote]

How this drivel comes across to a critical thinker:

"Hey! What about me! I'm a loser that trolls under different names... because I'm a gutless coward that can't post under my actual username! I'll talk about crickets at another blog, while riding the Demand Studios Sucks barge down!

I did so great in school today!

My teacher rewarded me by allowing me to wear that special hat that looked like one of those orange traffic cones. I get my own throne when that happens, it's in the corner.

Well, anyway, she wouldn't let me have my beanie cap with the propeller on top. I was mad until the short yellow school bus came and picked me up. Unnnghuyuuushaaaawuuyuuh!" -- Retard DSS Poster Jeremy, aka the other usernames, stolen or original... while rocking his upper body back and forth while doing the T-Rex with his arms...

Fixed to reflect accuracy.

Demand Studios Sucks' CE_ClueBat is a Racist and Supremacist

A commenter described one of CE_ClueBat's "mommy issue" rants. I wonder if that mommy issue stemmed from her mother's disapproval of CE_ClueBat's wanting to join the KKK?

This dummy couldn't get the facts straight even if they'd smash into her face:

"He's a sperm donor. That's good. I mean, we can't have these mulattos ruining good ol' 'merican blood." -- CE_ClueBat

First, most the recipients for my sperm are American couples. Second, my forefathers came here during the colonial times, and have served in almost every major war as far back as the US Civil War. Mulatto? Not even by a long shot. Third, the fact that you're racist, and a supremacist, is well noted.

DSS' DespicableMe has a Despicable IQ Level--Bump it up 5 Points and He'll be a Retard

Here's another turd that makes an unqualified comment. His comments contradict a professional's assessment of me. This assclown makes it hard for me to continue to argue against abortion:

"Annnnnnd this is why I can never adopt a child. I'd spend the entire time worrying that I'm taking on the offspring of someone with a strange mental illness like this tard. Genetics are a bitch." -- DespicableMe

Are you normally this stupid, or were you trying extra hard when you farted that comment out? Compared to you, a mentally ill person would be an improvement. (Disclaimer, I'm not trying to insult the mentally ill or challenged.)

Heck, if the turd I'm addressing in this post improves its IQ by about 5 points, it'd qualify for the retard label.

Justbrowsing's one Brain Cell Departed to Seek Employment

[quote]Originally posted by Justbrowsing 

A sperm donor? LOL! Scary. Let's just all thank him because that is just how we roll here at DSS.

Thank you notfat nonbasement I-only-masterbate-for-a-good-cause trying-too-hard-to-prove-I'm-not-Jeremy fog, oh I mean blog, man. Thank you.[/quote]

What I find scary is that your parents are allowing you to use the computer to spew your garbage, instead of for doing homework. It's not hard to prove you assclowns wrong when you attempt to assume things about me. All I have to do is provide the facts.

If you think that I'm the imposter that posts under multiple names... on Demand Studios Sucks... then you're dumber than what you're portraying on DSS.

BurnCEs is Afraid to Post via an Account, yet Accuses me of Being a Pussy

[quote]Originally posted by BurnCEs

Thanks for reminding me, Willie. Reading Thebesig's blog is like staring into an abyss of lunacy.[/quote]

Hmm, where have I heard this before? That's right, young people that think that they know everything... and that their parents are "dumb." BurnCes' comments is like that of a teenager going on about how his/her parents don't understand anything... and how these parents come across as if they're from another planet.

Its comment, about people living on the field as a result of Demand Media Studios' decisions, sounds juvenile.

When his parents catch him messing around on the internet, I wonder if he'll lose his computer... or will his parent's shoot his laptop?

[quote] Originally posted by BurnCEs

I notice that Thebesig is such a cringing, lily-livered, yellow-streaked pussy that he's disabled comments on his blog unless you sign in with your Google Account (and fuck that for trolling).[/quote]

So let me get this straight. This turd wanted to make an anonymous post, but couldn't. It has to log in with a Google account in order to defecate in one of the comments boxes. Because it has to log in with an account, it's afraid to leave a comment.

This dingbat is too much of a coward to post with his account. I haven't received notification that BurnCEs has a comment that needs moderation.

There's a reason that I turned anonymous postings off. It has nothing to do with fear. It has more to do with my not being a big fan of anonymous posting.

People tend to shift to retard mode when they could post anonymously. Force them to sign in with a username, or without their anonymity, and they tend to restrain themselves more. Many all of a sudden lose their "bravery" and decide that they didn't want to post after all.

It takes more guts to say something under an identifiable username... than it does when cowering from behind the veil of being anonymous.

BurnCEs needs to quit acting like a coward before accusing others of being yellow livered pussies.