Debunking Joe Jagunich's anti-Trump Argument of August 2019 Introduction

Joe Jagunich demonstrated poor knowledge of what he was debating. Hopefully, his performance on that instrument isn't like his debate performance.  (Facebook)

I entered a Facebook debate against Joe Jagunich in August 2019. A mutual friend generated a Facebook post addressing Congressman Stauber. Joe Jagunich was one of the posters that jumped in and supported the thread starter. He attacked President Trump and his policies.

He was among those that I debunked. Joe Jagunich was one of two posters, on that thread, who blocked me instead of conceding defeat. When a poster blocks me, I use that as justification to smoothen out my replies and post them here.

His statements were copied over, but not edited. They are as Joe Jagunich posted them.

During the course of the debate, I asked him a simple yes/no only question. The correct answer to this question destroyed the specific argument that Joe Jagunich made. He failed to answer that question.

Since this argument occurred during the summer of 2019, my responses are based on factors that were applicable at the time of the debate.

If Joe Jagunich is a Christian, his argument is a contradiction to God's Commandments, statutes, and judgments. By extension, they're a contradiction to the Gospels. Among God's statutes in the Old Testament is the requirement to "diligently search the truth" before rendering judgment.

My responses represent the results of "diligently searching the truth". Had Joe Jagunich done the same thing, and if he were impartial, he would not have made the argument that he made. This is assuming that he is a "practicing Christian".

When the opposition debates me on Facebook or in other private media, they have two choices to make. Get destroyed in a private setting, or get destroyed in a public setting. When they chose to block or unfriend instead of ceding the argument, they chose to take the whoppen in a public setting.