Mac, the Troops are Welfare Whores, gets Schooled on What Constitutes a Strawman Argument

Mac, The Troops are Welfare Whores: Joe the entire thing is a straw man argument. 

The basics of a strawman argument:

Person "A" advances statement "X."
Person "B" advances statement "Y," a distorted version of statement "X."
Person "B" concludes that statement "Y," is wrong.
By extension, since "Y," is wrong, then "X" is also wrong.

The original post contains a link to Mark's opinion. You explain that this was a case of a mall cop telling a bunch of civilians that they don't understand the risks that mall cops deal with. This may have happened in another thread or another part of the Internet.

It didn't happen in the quoted statements in your original post.

Mark is "Person A."
You're "Person B."
Mark's statement is "Statement X," and your statement is "Statement Y." The rest follows the above flow for a strawman argument. Based on this formula, and based on your actions, your statement constituted a strawman argument.

Now, the original post resulted in another post. This is a post that hinted that millions of armed civilians are needed... and that the troops wouldn't be needed. That post, the response to that post, and your response to that response, drew me in. I stayed on that specific topic during my reply.

Mac, The Troops are Welfare Whores: I'm not interested in theoretically discussing how well a bunch of totally disorganized civilians would repel an invasion, because it's not relevant to anything I believe.

First, you were interested in arguing that point. I quoted you supporting such an argument. You back peddled from it when I proved that argument wrong.

Second, my arguing something that you don't believe in doesn't constitute a strawman argument. Your reason for something being a "strawman" doesn't fit the above strawman flow.

The topic that I'm arguing against came up courtesy of other posters on this thread. You supported that concept, indirectly, when you brought up the points about the Vietnam War. My argument was against you, and those that shared your opinion.

Your arguments helped shore up the argument advanced by another poster. This poster argued that we didn't need the troops. He insinuated that millions of armed civilians, in the wealthiest country in the world, "could handle" the job just fine.

How these civilians do against a trained enemy military, or organized armed group, is evident throughout history, and even during current events.

For example, there are more armed Iraqis than the stated number of people in ISIL. I know this, as I've combat deployed to Iraq as an infantryman.

That fact, about an armed population, hasn't been effective with most Iraqi civilian effort to repel ISIS. In fact, their tribal militia are arguing that the U.S. Military should do more to intervene to repel ISIS.

There are reports that elements of Iran's standing army is providing help to Iraqi militias.

The same is also true in Afghanistan. There are more armed Afghanis than there are members of the Taliban. What would count as "civilian militia populations" in these countries haven't been effective in repelling the radical Islamic threat.

Having a standing Army on your side makes a world of difference.

Mac, The Troops Are Welfare Whores: The point of mentioning the nukes is that any country that invaded the US would be nuked immediately. You must surely know that.

Here's what I do know.

Department of Defense Policy, and US Government Policy, prohibits "first use" of nuclear weapons. There are exceptions, but these exceptions aren't the norm. The primary effort is conventional force used first.

Meaning, if a conventional military response is enough to repel the threat, no nuclear weapons will be launched.

Even the Chinese and Russians don't have the logistics and power projection capabilities to launch an invasion of any US State. Meaning, the United States, right now, would be able to repel a foreign invasion from these two countries. They'd be able to do it conventionally.

Now, if they immediately use nuclear weapons against us prior to their conventional strike, then we'd immediately use nuclear weapons in response.

Don't make assumptions about what I do or don't know simply because you don't want to admit that you're wrong. 

Mac,Troops are Welfare Whores, Utilized Strawman Arguments

Mac, The Troops are Welfare Whores: I know what a straw man argument is. I have written extensively on the topic of logical fallacies.

Then you should know that you're engaging in straw man fallacies on this thread. Whether you've written about that fallacy or not is beside the point. In practice, you don't appear to know what constitutes a strawman fallacy.

You don't seem to know that you're actually engaging in it while erroneously accusing others of engaging in strawman tactics.

Trying to claim that "this is a strawman" because it's not something that you subscribe to isn't you accurately identifying what a strawman is.

The points that I brought up on this thread directly addresses the points that I was countering... I wasn't countering something similar or that sounded the same... I countered what was actually being said while remaining on the topic that they started... that doesn't constitute my advancing a strawman argument.

Mac, the Troops are Welfare Whores: And I seriously doubt if there would be a conventional military response to an invasion. We'll have to disagree about that, because neither of us know.

Again, I've been in the military for over 1/5th of a century, cumulatively. I've practiced this craft, to include training to maintain my professional specialties as part of a larger training effort. I've done this long enough to know for a fact that we won't always immediately resort to a nuclear strike.

The last time I've trained in a scenario that involved nuclear weapons was back in the 1990s. The last battle problem that I did, involving nuclear weapons use training scenario, was almost 2 decades ago.

Every time we did these training scenarios, these battle problems began with a conventional scenario... and it evolved into "mass conflagration." This was also known as the losing side, the Soviets or rogue third world dictator, using tactical nuclear weapons.

You see, that's the key... by the losing side.

If we successfully repel an invasion using conventional forces, there'd be no need to resort to nuclear war... unless the losing side resorts to it in order to regain momentum in an attempt to complete their invasion.

As part of my profession, I have to know the doctrines that impact what the military does. Those doctrines, specifically talking about nuclear weapons, don't identify those weapons as being "first resort" weapons.

Don't tell me what I do know, or don't know, about a profession that I've practiced most my adult and professional life. Thank me for giving you a clue about how the real military would do things against your lack of knowledge about what you're talking about here.

Don't make assumptions about what I do or don't know about this topic. Have the honor and integrity to know that I know more about this topic than you... I have experience against your lack of it. You should be thanking me for educating you in the face of your not knowing what you're talking about.

It's painfully obvious that you need to do a lot of research in the areas that we debated. Your argument in this topic isn't able to withstand a fact check.

What I'm telling you are facts based on firsthand experience. I'm also giving you a perspective that's based on my familiarity with our doctrine and law involving the use of nuclear weapons.

If what you said were true, we would've turned Afghanistan into a glowing mushroom garden. We didn't. We used a conventional and special forces response instead. We also used economic, political, and other types of responses.

Mac, The Troops are Welfare Whores: Also, you should try to be more concise. This isn't a very good medium for such long comments.

The fact that I post in the length that I post contributes to my being able to do this:

"Although, I must thank you for your calm and articulate comments. We aren't used to that around here." -- Mac, Troops are Welfare Whores

I could do one of two things, I could lacerate you guys via a flame war, which doesn't take a long post to engage in... or I could advance a factual, reasoned, and logical argument. The latter requires a lengthy response at times.

You should be thankful for my long posts. 

Mac, "The Troops are Welfare Whores," Lies in a Debate he's Losing, he bans the Victor to Protect his Ego

Mac, "The The Troops are Welfare Whores": I am not engaging in straw man fallacies, 

Actually, you are engaging in straw man fallacies. You provided a link, in your first post, to a statement from Mark. You quoted Mark's asking that you guys address the causes of warfare. He provided you with examples of approaches that you could take. He tried to discourage you guys from attacking members of the military.

Your summary of the account?

That a "mall cop" was trying to tell you "civilians" that you guys were being "softheaded," or something to that effect.

The implication there is that the post that you linked to captured him criticizing you guys for not knowing the risks that he went through. When the readers read that post that you linked to, where you include his statements, that's not the impression that they get.

You advanced a strawman argument.

Mac, "The The Troops are Welfare Whores": Joe and you are banned for lying.

If you read the posts that I made, I proved my case that you advanced a strawman argument. I wouldn't have done that had I "lied."

There's only one liar between the two of us, and it isn't me.

You assumed that you weren't advancing a strawman argument, when in fact that's what you were doing. You assumed that I was advancing a strawman argument, when in fact I was countering the points made.

I wasn't countering points not related to what I was responding to... in an attempt to tie them to the actual argument. I countered the actual argument.

You failed to prove your point. You reacted by banning me instead of being man enough to "take what's coming".

Mac, The Troops are Welfare Whores: I fucking thanked you for being calm and articulate on this page and you come up with some bullshit like that?

First:

"It's for that reason us admins are careful of what language we use. You'll almost never see us curse, use the r-word for a slow person, etc. There's multiple pages devoted to monitoring and reporting us. I wish I was joking." -- "The troops are welfare whores"

Yup, alias Stephen "Mac" Duffy, you made a liar out of your admins, didn't you? :D

Second, I was consistently calm and articulate throughout that thread. That tone didn't change. What did change was your perception of my posts.

Your perception changed as the thread progressed, because you were getting more and more emotional. You were getting more emotional, because my arguments forced you to question your own stance. Your ego refused to acknowledge that fact.

Your blood kept on boiling when I forced you to see the fallacy of your stance.

You couldn't be man enough to even stand by your implied argument. You dismissed that as something that "you didn't originally believe." The more your blood boiled, the more my posts came across to you as something other than what they actually were.

What you consider as "bullshit" is me forcing you into a position to where you're questioning your own stance.

If you're going to sling factually challenged comments, be man enough to take the blistering fact check scrutiny. You could always avoid that by doing your research, by studying, and by arguing from the facts instead of from your emotions and feelings. 

William Derek Church is not an Army Ranger or Combat Veteran

William Derek Church, of Lenoir, North Carolina, is parading himself as a Veteran Army Ranger with Combat Deployments to Iraq. He showed himself in photos wearing SSG rank, service stripes indicating a full career, and medals he didn't earn. His infantry blue chord is on the wrong side, his beret is improperly worn, and he looks like a sack of potatoes trying to wear a uniform.

There are other uniform discrepancies as well, like trousers badly in need of tailoring, and badges worn in the wrong places.

He claimed getting shot in the sternum five times, and is using that as a reason for his alleged disability.

What's the truth about this clown?

He served in the Army National Guard from February 22, 1994 to September 13, 1995. William Derek Church went on active duty from August 8, 1995 to September 13, 1995. He was discharged as a Private First Class. His only award was the National Defense Service Medal, for being on active duty during the Persian Gulf War.

He reported to Basic Combat Training on June 21, 1994, and graduated on August 12, 1994. He reported to his unit to do one weekend a month drills until it was time for him to do AIT. He reported to Advanced Individual Training on August 7, 1995 but was discharged on September 13, 1995.

He was discharged from the military while attempting to complete Advanced Individual Training.

Thanks to "This Aint Hell" and others for giving this embellisher/phony his "spotlight." 

Jay Kerwin, of Bootcamp LA, Never a SEAL, Never an Air Force Pararescue Jumper

Retired Senior Chief Don Shipley, also a retired SEAL, would've never contacted Jay (Jason) Kerwin had it not been for Jay Kerwin's SEAL claims. Don Shipley doesn't just investigate someone that claimed SEAL once. He'll investigate the person that repeatedly, and knowingly, claimed to be a Navy SEAL.

Jay Kerwin, the guy that runs Bootcamp LA, as "The Major," had insinuated being a Navy SEAL veteran, as well as being an Air Force Pararescue Commando veteran. The reality? He never served a day in the Navy. He did serve in the Air Force, but got kicked out for selling an unauthorized drug/supplement to other service members.

His Freedom of Information Request Act response shows that he made it to Basic Military Training. It also shows that he went from being a student, in one of the schools he went to, to being a prisoner. He spent a good amount of time in the Air Force as a prisoner prior to being discharged as an E1. He never was a major, he never was in the Navy, and he never was a pararescue commando.

On his Bootcamp LA page, he made the following disclaimer:

"Disclaimer: Jay Kerwin is not a military officer nor has he ever been. Additionally, any reference made by third parties online or in the media to Jay being a member of the U.S. Navy or a Navy SEAL is inaccurate." -- BootCamp LA website

This is deceptive. "Being," without clarification, implies present tense, which isn't what many in the veteran community are complaining about. They have issues with his claims of being a Navy SEAL, and Air Force PJ, in the past. This disclaimer allows Jason Kerwin to claim that he was one or both of these groups once the attention switches away from him.

Judging by the fact that Jason Kerwin was discharged as an E1, after being in military prison for a long time, he may have received a type of discharge that disqualifies him from being considered a veteran.

Thanks to Don Shipley, of Extreme SEAL Experience, for exposing this phony. Thanks to This Aint Hell for giving this individual some "fame and spotlight". 

Jeff Orchard, Of Sabina Ohio, Never Special Forces, Not Retired Military

Jeff Orchard, of Sabina Ohio, talked a good game of being "Special Forces" serving in Vietnam. When asked for details on this experience, he resorted to the "it's secret" or "can't talk about it" excuse. This is usually a sign that someone didn't do what they claimed they did. It doesn't help him that he's claiming to have served in Vietnam years after the US pulled out.

Jeff Orchard also has people believing that he retired from the military.

The truth?

Jeffrey Earl Orchard served in the Army from May 11, 1982 to January 14, 1997. He served on active duty from May 11, 1982 to April 22, 1994. This is approximately 14 years, 8 months and 3 days of military service; of which approximately 11 years, 11 months and 11 days were spent on active duty; and the final 2 years, 8 months, and 22 days of his military service were spent in the Individual Ready Reserves.

No Special Forces Qualification Course is listed in his education history. No combat deployment, or combat deployment related awards, are listed in the response to the query into his military record.

His wife, Christy Broughton -- Orchard insisted that he was retired. If he's getting a "retirement" it's not from regular military service. His time fell short of the 15 year early retirement program that they were offering some service members back in the '90s. With "IRR" as his last status, it's unlikely that he's getting medical retirement. Christy Broughton may have mistaken his VA compensation check (if he's receiving such), or some other payment, as his "retirement" check.

Thanks to Scotty, of Stolen Valor, for the research exposing this embellisher/phony. Thanks to This Aint Hell for giving this person some "fame and spotlight." 

Youtube's 155 Millimeter, AKA "Kings of Battle" is a Faker

In one video, 155 millimeter showed what looked like a coin. He claimed that the coin came straight from Washington. He claimed that it was pinned on his chest, in the battle field, for an act of valor that almost cost him his life.

Unfortunately for him, his "medal" looks like a coin, which you could purchase from a mint, or a battalion or company challenge coin. There is a medal "from Washington," and that's the Congressional Medal of Honor. There's a recommendation process that involves sending an award write-up through the chain of command to the person that could approve or disapprove the award.

These awards don't just mysteriously come down from Washington D.C.

What 155 Millimeter shows, on his video, "Valor Thief or Washington Recognized Warfighter? You decide," isn't the kind of medal that's pinned on anybody's chest.

This isn't the only indicator that You Tube's "155 Millimeter" aka "Kings of Battle" is a faker.

There's a training video that he put up that involved "room clearing." In that video, you see an empty hallway. Then you hear some toy electronic noises, then the door opens as 155 millimeter, wearing his beret and sporting a toy weapon, barges in. He points to one of the doors, and you hear the electronic noises from the weapon again. He opens the door after he "fires" into it. He lowered his "weapon" down to take a look into another door.

His demonstration doesn't match how things are really done.

In general cases, you don't just shoot at a door, then open it to see if you killed anybody. Moving as part of a team, you enter the room and "cover" the entire area with your team's firepower. You don't pull the trigger to take someone down unless you positively identify that someone as a hostile. If you shoot first, you're letting potential hostiles, on the other side of the door, know that you're there and... in 155 Millimeter's case... know exactly where you're at. You could also end up killing non-hostiles.

If 155 Millimeter did, what he demonstrated in the video, in the real world, he would've been shot and/or killed.

There's another video that he put up, that talks about doing "red leg" PT. In this case, it was a training exercise on doing ruck marches. Again, just by looking at how he does things, it's obvious that he's making things up, or basing things on pre-conceived assumptions.

First, he stuffs a duffle bag with nearly 500 pounds of weights. This is assuming that he's telling the truth. He claims that "pogues" ruck with ruck sacks, and that red legs rucked with duffle bags. I do recall a movie where military trainees marched around with their duffle bags on their backs. However; in the Army, it doesn't matter if you're combat arms, combat support, or combat service support. If the ruck march is the prescribed training/operational event, the ruck sack is generally the prescribed item that the Soldier must use. This is the case most of the time.

Second, that video doesn't show him carrying the riffle properly. He had it at somewhat of a port arms. When we do a tactical road march, we have our rifles at the "low ready." He also claimed that you used the weapon as leverage to assist your movement. To demonstrate that, he swung his weapon back and forth in front of him.

He looked really silly doing that, we don't use our weapons that way.

If you wear the rucksack, and other items on you, properly, you'll already have stability and balance. Moving the weapon horizontally in front of you doesn't serve a purpose.  

One key issue, that Veterans hammer him on, is his DD 214. A service member that leaves active duty, actual active duty, receives one of these. 155 Millimeter aka "Kings of Battle" wouldn't have a problem showing this, less sensitive information, to personalities like retired Navy SEAL Don Shipley. The later did ask 155 Millimeter for a copy of his DD 214.

The response? Another video, done by 155 Millimeter, aka "red legs" or "Kings of Battle," showing a bunch of snot rolling down his nose... followed by a scene of him walking circles in his living room. In the video description, 155 Millimeter goes up in arms about Don Shipley's "daring" to ask him for a DD 214. Nowhere in that video does 155 Millimeter show a DD 214 that other veterans can examine.

155 Millimeter implies that he took part in operations in the "Secret Gulf War." This puts him in the same category... as those older people who claimed that they took part in the "Secret Vietnam War" that took place after US forces officially pulled out from Vietnam.

At best, 155 Millimeter did serve, but didn't come close to accomplishing the things that he claims to have accomplished. At worst, he never served, and he's basing his stories on what other people have said... or on the fiction that he as read.

Profile of the Demand Studios Sucks Agitator

What do Page 1 News, Just Browsing, Undercover, and CE Cluebat have in common? They have something to do with journalism. Now, there is a Demand Studios Sucks poster that brags about her journalism. That person is behind those four accounts... as well as other DSS zombie accounts.

Now, who is this agitator?

Like I said before, this person isn't relevant in her real life. To make up for that, she plays games on Demand Studios Sucks in order to gain some relevancy. This gives her a sense of "control." As part of this "control," she'll exaggerate information, mostly as a liar. Lying for her is natural. If she has access to the facts, she'll exaggerate and manipulate them as well.

This person's main DSS zombie identity doesn't get involved with the drama that she starts. She creates sock puppets for that.

She'll get people to react a certain way on the website, then sit back and watch from the sidelines. To her, this is a way to drive more traffic, viewing and posting, to DSS. The more audience and traffic, the better it is in her mind. DSS is her little fiefdom.

Many of the posters, in the blog response section, have accurately identified the sock puppets under the same puppet master's control.

Who is this puppet master?

Find someone, on Demand Studios Sucks, that acts "normal," as if she's just "stumbling" onto the fiasco. This someone is associated with journalism, associated with travel, and is interested in keeping DSS afloat. This person will have pictures containing things associated with travel in her avatars, or blogs.

Jennifer Attacks Veterans on Month When Government Shutdown Withholds Survivor Benefits

[quote]Originally posted by Jennifer

Jeremy Briggs is a lunatic

October 19, 2013 at 4:34 pm * Reply [/quote]

My tying your different sock puppets to you is starting to take a toll, isn't it? Do continue to rant and deteriorate. I'm discovering more of your sock puppets on Demand Studios Sucks. Your "lunatic" commentary reminds me of this:

"Makes me think this whackadoodle is my intense IRL stalker. SCARY SHIT! Someone call Interpol, ASAP!" -- Page 1 News

Yup, you, just like your other sock puppets, can't be original. It seems like you're the stalker that you like to accuse people of being.

Jennifer: For those who are interested, here is the unmasking of "thebesig," 

People on Demand Studios Sucks, looking at my blog, were able to trace who I was a long time ago. Your pointing this out illustrates your desperation. You like to stir up drama on Demand Studios Sucks, using your different sock puppets.

I've long suspected who your other sock puppets were, and who the puppeteer is. But, unlike most of you retards, I sit back and observe and gather facts. So continue to show me your desperation. I take sadistic pleasure in unmasking you... which has been one of the aims of my batches of blog posts.

This unmasking has been an ongoing campaign. I wonder which sock puppet you're going to use this time to try to dismiss what I say here.

Jennifer: the silly shmuck Jeremy Briggs who was kicked off this forum, shitcanned at DMS, who crashes airplanes,

First, let's find a "Jeremy Briggs" who's in the military... here we go:

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/jeremy-briggs/75/969/79

Now, here's a big question. Do I have a ground pounder hair cut, or do I have that of a pilot? As you could see, in the photo, he's a UH 60 MEDEVAC pilot. Now, let's expose your insensitive azz.

MEDEVAC stands for "medical evacuation." That's opposed to "CASEVAC," which is something that "ground pounders" would be involved with. If a service member is injured or wounded, combat or non-combat related, or sick, that UH 60 becomes an ambulance.

Now, why do I say this? During a month when surviving members had their benefits withheld?

You joke around about "crashing airplanes." It's like you don't take loss of lives seriously. If Jeremy Briggs were to crash that UH-60... and he were carrying patients in need of advanced medical attention provided at a major FOB... and he crashed, what do you think would happen to those patients?

Here, let me break this down for you. Imagine if an ambulance was rushing your loved one to the hospital. The driver, who was drunk, crashes the ambulance. Death claims your loved one in the process. How would you react to someone joking about crashing ambulances?

You have no sensitivity for the service members that've died out there. You certainly don't have any sensitivity for the surviving family members, with your rants about this Soldier "crashing planes."

Second, I still have the ability to post on the blog comment section. I don't exercise that. Now, had you said something about the Demand Studios Sucks forums, that would've been a different thing.

You, as a regular poster on that section, as well as in the forums, via your different sock puppets, should've known that. This means that even when it comes to things that you should know, you have your head shoved up your azz.

The more accurate term here is that I got "locked out" from the Demand Studios Sucks Forums for destroying that forum's bullies. Again, you people, as well as the voices in your head, couldn't handle my continuing to stand my ground. You can't handle my continuing to strike back at you retards on this blog.

Third, I abandoned Demand Media Studios, as a writer, long before they removed my permissions. This is like having a club membership pulled for inactivity. That's what you're cheering. You also ignore the fact that many of your allies got booted from Demand Media Studios.

Jennifer: rants like a psychopath and posts on a certain blog ya'll enjoy laughing at.

Hmm...

"Thanks for reminding me, Willie. Reading Thebesig's blog is like staring into an abyss of lunacy" -- BurnCEs

Two things pop up here. One, claims of mental issues, and two, swipes at the blog, all in one sentence.

And, who are these, "you all" that you're talking about? Are you describing the voices in your head? Are they your sock puppets? Or, are they for the single handful of people that hang out at Demand Studios Sucks?

There's only one thing that's "psychopath" about this. You have issues with the fact that I keep coming back to hammer the voices in your head and you.

Also, nobody is laughing at my blog. I'm the only one that's enjoying this experience. The voices in your head, and you, are rather annoyed that I won't go away.

Jennifer: He's military. Lives in Virginia Beach, VA. 

Again, this is information that Demand Studios Sucks zombies already figured out a long time ago. The fact that you'd mention this shows your desperation in the face of my exposing your sock puppets and you.

I'm still curious as to which sock puppet you're going to roll out in your defense this time.

Jennifer: And is almost certainly a stone-cold whacko. 

Again:

"Makes me think this whackadoodle is my intense IRL stalker. SCARY SHIT! Someone call Interpol, ASAP!" -- Page 1 News

And this:

"He's clearly an unhinged military dude with an M-16." -- Page 1 News

But wait! There's more! We have this:

"Thanks for reminding me, Willie. Reading Thebesig's blog is like staring into an abyss of lunacy" -- BurnCEs

The only thing that makes me a "stone-cold whacko" in your eyes is that I refuse to "let go" of you... just as you refuse to let go of whomever you hold on to.

Jennifer: Then again, that's the caliber of DMS contracting, for ya. Lots of damaged folks scribbling for that useless shit of a company.

You described yourself to a "T." Hey, didn't you work at Demand Media Studios? That's right, you did, as one of your online profiles show. The cold hard reality is that you're damaged, a whacko, and an internet stalker.

Of course, you were damaged long before you worked at DMS. Someone identified you as having "mommy issues." You're consistently getting "crap canned" from message boards that you post on. Unfortunately, that still hasn't clued you on where the real problem lies.

Some advice; quit projecting your traits onto others, and start owning up to your own failures.

One of the reasons I left Demand Studios, and refused to write for them, and/or abandoned the latest re-write requests, is that I'm not damaged, like you.

Jennifer: Regards, An amused journalist. 

I've seen journalists make posts on forums and on social media. They're similar to each other in demeanor, and professionalism. None of them were like you. If you're a journalist, you come across as being a washed up reject.

However; you're not amused by any of this. You're actually agitated that I refuse to quit hammering you. 

Demand Studios Sucks Sock Puppets Argue With Each Other

[quote]Jeremy Briggs
October 18, 2013 at 2:58 pm * Reply

I'm watching you retard butt munchers. I'll blog about you. So there.
Soon as I learn how to fly a plane with a hangover.[/quote]

First, I don't post on the Demand Studios Sucks blog comments section. If I have something to say, I'd say it on this blog. It's obvious, though, that you're the same person that posts under the other aliases on that website.

Second, are you that desperate for attention that you end up responding to yourself? Or, is this an attempt to provide free, new posts to Demand Studios Sucks? I wouldn't be surprised if you're trying to trick others to post there. DMS is the only place you feel relevant in the world. You love to go there and start some drama.

For a journalist, you seem to waste a lot of time having a self conversation with your sock puppets. 

A Demand Media Studios CE Slams a DSS Sock Puppet...

[quote] CE Responds
October 29, 2013 at 9:29 am * Reply

As someone who worked as a freelancer for Demand until recently, I can testify that Other Info has his or her facts wrong.
...
You also mentioned his "alleged" involvement as the author of "books." A quick search of Amazon, Abe's Books and other sites finds 20 titles under his byline. A search of the net finds interviews with him by reputable columnists, including one that appeared in the Wall Street Journal, and he's appeared in documentaries on baseball on the MLB network.

By putting quote marks around "books," you seem to imply that the books don't exist, whereas clearly they do.

By "alleged," you seem to imply he didn't write the books. If you have hard evidence of that, present it here. If you don't, you're either a fabricator or a fantasist. [/quote]

She's both, a fabricator and a fantasist. She loves to stir drama on Demand Studios Sucks. She thrives on the resulting attention.

"Other Info" is a sock puppet. The puppeteer that I'm smacking around controls that sock puppet. Having facts wrong is epidemic on the Demand Studios Sucks website.

These azzclowns are losers in real life. The puppeteer, with her sock puppets, is the biggest loser of them all. They hate other people's success, because "Other Info" et al are largely failures. They attempt to diminish other people's success. They'd rather bash successful people. That's easier than doing what it takes to succeed as a writer... or anywhere in the professional world.

Telling them to do actual research, to back what they say, is a tall order for them. These DSS zombies have absolutely no use for the facts. One reason for this is that the actual facts make it hard for them to believe the nonsense that they want to believe.

Take their claims about my being here all the time for instance. They insinuated that I spent all my time on this blog, while conveniently ignoring my posting frequency across a year. It's easier on their ego to think that I'm a "failure" just like them... than to recognize the fact that I've succeeded in ways they never will.

In the same sense, they're trying to paint Richard Lally as a "failure" while refusing to acknowledge his success. At least Jeremy Briggs, the UH-60 pilot, can fly. These ding-dongs tend to fly off with their mouths instead... yet, they still manage to crash. 

"CE Responds" Smashes Same Demand Studios Sucks Sock Puppet

[quote] CE Responds
October 29, 2013 at 9:52 am * Reply

This post makes me wonder if this is the same writer I responded to earlier.[/quote]

It's the same f*k stick that you addressed in another post. You're dealing with a one woman trolling team; I recognize the tone and writing pattern. You've responded to a couple of her sock puppets.

This woman doesn't have any relevance in the real world; she finds it on Demand Studios Sucks. That site has been bleeding participation over the past two years. Most the other writers have moved on with their careers, writing or otherwise. So, this woman drums up drama on Demand Studios Sucks, not caring about content validity.

Whoever this person is, she has a powerful incentive to keep making sock puppet posts on that website. She has a strong need for that website to continue drawing traffic and participation. This gives her relevance.

[quote] CE Responds
October 29, 2013 at 9:52 am * Reply

I liked working with him and Demand, but you may have reasons to be angry or dissatisfied with the company. However, your firing your bullets at the wrong target. If you knew what Lally, and probably Lederman, do each day--I'd wager you don't know their daily tasks--you'd probably aim elsewhere.[/quote]

She doesn't care if her commentary is accurate or not. She'll rant against those that are doing better than her... she'll also rant against those that keep fighting her back.

But, speaking of their propelling bullets from a bullet launcher, I'd use another analogy. If their marksmanship was anything like the validity of their comments against those that they don't like... I'd hate to be the guy standing behind them as they tried to shoot the target in front of them. That'd be suicide. 

Demand Studios Sucks BurnCEs Lies to her Readers, as Usual

In addition to being a liar, she lacks integrity:

[quote]Re: lol thebesig is writing again..

Postby BurnCEs » Fri Oct 18, 2013 7:21 am

LOL thebesig's posted another batch. I've noticed he publishes his insane-a-grams about once a month, presumably at the same time his meds run out.

I particularly liked his "About Me" page:[/quote]

First, from my "DSS Zombie Q & A" post:

"Q: Can Demand Studios Sucks zombies ever say anything intelligent? Can we communicate with them?

"DSS zombies can say something intelligent that is NOT 100% retarded, but they usually follow that with name-calling or insults." -- Writer Cubed

I know these oxygen converters to the "T."

Second, that's not something that you noticed. That's something that you had to recognize after you read my response to the diarrhea fest that you call your posts. I see this as progress though, as at least you're willing to acknowledge a fact that I don't spend all my time on this blog.

Also, your reference to "meds" is you, and your retard buddies, not being original. Not only do you guys suck like your arguments, you guys suck at being original. You guys also suck at analytical reasoning.

If I were taking "meds" for what you imply are "mental" issues, I wouldn't be in the military. I would've been medically retired. Both military and VA doctors have found my mental health to be normal.

But, the fact that you'd take a swipe at a war veteran's mental health... in a month when surviving family members weren't able to get the death benefits they normally would've gotten... speaks volumes to your mental and psychological state.

You're blinded by your hatred against Demand Media Studios and against those that are succeeding... when you're sucking in life in comparison.

Again, it's a given that I'm going to reply to you retards, and continue to wage war against your credibility. The fact that my not posting on this blog for half a year... in response to you retards not attacking me for months... should've given you a hint that I'll subject your idiotic replies to a blistering fact check scrutiny.

Don't want me to keep hammering you guys? Then pull out of this fight like your fathers should've done with your mothers around the time you people were conceived.

Demand Studios Suck's Justbrowsing is Another Sock Puppet

BANG! Got one! Notice the similarity in this statement:

"He frontin' and got the banhammer. I axed him to stop, but he hadn't tooken the advice." -- CE_ClueBat

...with this one:

[quote] Postby Justbrowsing » Fri Oct 18, 2013 2:18 pm

Wow, that be some crazy talk right there. As in my Thorazine done failed me now crazy. On a positive note, it's good to have a healthy self-image and all. You go, Mr. theBesig, I'm rooting for you on your road to good mental health. Peace out dude. [/quote]

How many more of your sock puppets will I expose today, Jennifer?

Both, the inaccuracy of the content of your post, as well as how you said it, reeks strongly of someone that's seriously uneducated... and that has been raised in a barn.

Understand that when you attack a war veteran's mental health, you attack all veterans... You did this in the month when many surviving spouses/family members weren't able to get the death benefits due to them.

By your own definition of "crazy talk," every single one of you DSS zombies has serious mental issues. Or, is this "crazy talk" when you people get a taste of your own medicine?

But, since your retarded, uneducated mind obviously didn't get it, let me explain it in as simple a concept as possible.

My intro/bio page uses symbolisms to describe how I'm destroying you brain dead idiots in these exchanges. This builds onto the fact that this blog's specific, and current, purpose is to destroy you people's drivel and credibility.

Now, if that still went over your head, hire an interpreter that knows and understands retard. Perhaps that interpreter would be able to break it down into retard terms so that you could hopefully understand what's being said.

Tell that one brain celled activity to stop trying to take you over, and to start doing its job. You're doomed to continue posting as if a retarded ghost possesses you if you don't bring that one brain cell in line.

Here's another recommendation. Go back to trying to figure out why your solar powered flashlight won't work. That usually keeps you occupied. 

Squirrely Wrath Proves Himself Wrong Again

"Granted, I'm not too familiar with this guy, as I tend to scurry up into a tree when a flamewar starts." -- squirrely_wrath

Here he is, proving that statement wrong once again:

   [quote]Postby squirrely_wrath » Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:30 pm 

[quote]BurnCEs wrote:LOL thebesig's posted another batch. I've noticed he publishes his insane-a-grams about once a month, presumably at the same time his meds run out.
    I particularly liked his "About Me" page:

        [quote]Please leave your name, and a number I could reach you at, after the the beep so that I could get back with you as soon as I can.[/quote][/quote]

Hate to sound trollish, but...ESL, anyone? See Graf Notes....is that you? :shock:[/quote]

Actually, that's a variant of a statement that's usually said in a phone message. You know, the part about leaving your phone number so that the other person could get back to you? That's almost like trying to tie me to anyone that has said, "Enjoy your trip," or "Good luck on your trip!"

That's not the same thing as people saying the same thing, in tone, context, thought, structure, etc, like many of the sock puppets. 

Demand Studios Sucks Zombie Doesn't get it--What Part of the Cause and Effect Concept Does This Retard not Understand?

How stupid could a group of people get? It appears that these Demand Studios Sucks Zombies' main purpose in life is to serve as oxygen converters. If undercover, BurnCEs, Devil_youknow, squirrely_wrath, and CE_ClueBat get any dumber, they'll start photosynthesizing.

What's even worse? These retards attack a war veteran in the month containing the anniversary of the September 11, 2001 attacks.

Hmmm... Page1? Is this you?

[quote]Postby undercover » Thu Sep 12, 2013 7:15 pm
At great risk of giving thebesig attention, the last mentions of him here spurred a plethora of -- um, I'm not sure what to call it. :P I don't have time to read through it all right now, but it looks like it might provide entertainment.[/quote]

What part of, "I'll return fire" didn't you understand? How many times do I have to mention that before you people's thick sculls register the cause and effect? If you idiots fire in my direction, I'm going to fire back in your direction. It's that simple.

Again, let "X" be DSS zombies attacking me. Let "Y" be my counter attack. If "X," then "Y." If not "X," then not "Y." That's how it has been, that's how it's going to be... indefinitely.

Giving me attention on Demand Studios Sucks isn't the risk. The risk is you buddy f*ing the rest of the retards that posted right after you on that thread.

Your response is typical of a retard that starts slinging crap... but then finds oneself unable to hold on to an argument when the response comes back. The mere fact that you've read my blog updates... despite the fact that I don't actively advertise this blog... speaks volumes of how weak you people are.

I control every cubic inch of your heads. 

Demand Studio Suck Zombie BurnCE's Speaks Like Baghdad Bob

[quote]Postby BurnCEs » Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:26 am
Lol, thebesig's juvenile and delusional meanderings are always the perfect entertainment for a Friday.[/quote]

You need to quit acting like a spoiled brat kid--that can't handle getting your azz handed to you--before mislabeling someone as "juvenile" and "delusional." Better yet, show the world that there's someone "up there," and that this isn't just a case of the lights being on and nobody being home.

In other words, you need to know what you're talking about.

Instead of putting up a real debate... because you don't have an argument... you fart out your delusional opinion about how much time I spend on this blog making my posts. More on that later.

The cold hard reality is that you're not amused at these series of blog posts. I'm pissing you off by handing you your azz in a way that you can't get back at me... unless you act juvenile and crap out a post attempting to dismiss what I say.

[quote]The funniest line from his latest error-strewn diatribe is this:

[quote]    If they were real writers, writing for clients, they wouldn't be wasting their time attacking anybody else.[/quote]

... immediately after a 2,000 word post, and several other posts, ineffectually attacking posters here.[/quote]

First, don't dismiss the facts as "error," simply because your fragile ego can't handle the blistering fact check scrutiny that I'm subjecting you retards to.

You're forgetting a key fact... I'm not going out of my way to attack you guys. I'm providing counter attacks. The difference between us is that your attacks are pro active. That's what I talked about in my previous posts. No writer, worth their salt, would proactively go out of their way to attack another writer.

That's not to be confused with my counter attacking you Demand Studios Sucks zombies. These counter attacks are reactive... I'm not going out of my way to attack you guys. I am; however, responding to your attacks. That's a big difference in the eyes of those who don't have a stake in this exchange.

Your uneducated, logic deficient, assumptions-based-post also misses the mark in other areas.

Second, if my counter attacks against you people were "ineffectual," you guys wouldn't reply to me anywhere on Demand Studios Sucks. You guys wouldn't even mention me, directly or indirectly. The mere fact that you guys added to the thread, dedicated to my actions, speaks volumes to the fact that I was very effectual against you. Not only was I effective in hammering you guys... I got you guys where it hurts.

Understand that there's a purpose to everything that I type. I'm playing you guys like a fiddle, you guys are responding exactly the way I expect you guys to respond. I get a lot of enjoyment out of your reactions.

Again, I take sadistic pleasure in destroying you guys in argument. You people like to lie to the other readers... and to the other voices in your heads... and claim that you guys are "amused." The reality? You're not. I'm the only one that gets pleasure in these exchanges.

Third, if you had a working brain, you'd notice that my last batch of replies here got posted on September 3, 2013. Quick, how many days has it been since that day, and the day these current series of posts were posted?

I have a feeling that requiring you to do simple math is going to cause you to have a headache.

So do this. Count the days on the calendar, one by one, between September 3 and the day I made these current batches of posts. Don't count the days that I post. How many days did you get? I'm asking you this in hopes that counting past 10 doesn't give you a headache.

Fourth, by throwing numbers around, and neglecting to mention when those posts were made, and how often posts are made on this blog, you're being deceptive. You're counting on your fellow DSS zombies to simply focus on what you mention, and conclude what you want them to conclude.

Since you're gullible like the rest of them, you know that you could count on them to fall for your deception hook, line, and sinker.

Fifth, as of these series of posts, I haven't posted that many days this year.

I made a series of posts on July 29, 2013, prior to making the last series of posts on September 3, 2013. You could fit an entire month between those two posting days, plus have spare days. You could fit an entire month between September 3, 2013, and October 16, 2013; and still have spare days. This brings about an important question...

What in God's name did I do outside these posting days? It's definitely not spending time on the Demand Studios Sucks website. It's not spending time posting on this blog. I have engaged in other productive activities, as well as activities in support of those primary activities. This includes military, writing, traveling, etc.

"ETA: why doesn't it post in blue any more? Like in the good old days when it got kicked off this site by CW." -- BurnedCEs

I still post with blue text when I post on forums with a color scheme that lends itself to blue text posting. As of this writing, I generally don't post in blue text on blogs.

Also, I wasn't kicked off the site, I was banned from the forums in order to protect your fragile egos. You people expected me to run like many others. I didn't do that, which frustrated you guys. I stood my ground and hammered you guys; you guys, as bullies, weren't used to that.

I made every DSS zombie look like azzess... with them realizing deep down inside that they fall short in the critical thinking department.

That didn't sit well with you bullies, especially when you guys weren't used to receiving your own treatment.

I had the benefit of knowing the forum administrators of two other message boards that I posted on before. They told me how the opposition screamed for my banning. They also told me how the opposition wanted the thread to be locked. These demands boiled down to the opposition not being able to handle my shoving them through the meat grinder.

Fortunately the administrators on the other message boards, that I posted on, weren't easy push-overs, and weren't vulnerable to mob control. They allowed me to continue posting. The Demand Studios Sucks administrators were no different from the CEs, and above, in Demand Media Studios.

Both expected the "commoners" to accept the "you're wrong" label, and to keel over and be walked all over. Those that refused got shown the door.

Error strewn doesn't describe my posts. It does; however, describes your line of thinking. The school system that graduated you should get sued for dereliction of duty... or someone needs to send your picture to your parents, with the following statement underneath: "Why did you punish the world by not raising this turd right?"  

DSS "Devil You Know" Attempts "Situation Redefinition" to Hide the Fact that the DSS Zombies are Getting Massacred

"He's clearly an unhinged military dude with an M-16." -- Page 1 News

[quote] Postby Devil_youknow » Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:41 am
Meh, just think about it this way.
The more time he sits at his computer writing about us, the more time he spends away from the real world and innocent good God-fearing people. We're taking the bullet.
The Demand Studios Sucks Forum. We save lives.[/quote]

First, shame on you for stereotyping veterans as people that are likely to go postal... two days after the anniversary of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. The media is perpetrating a myth about the "unhinged war veteran," and you fell for it hook, line and sinker.

That statement also aligns you with the terrorist organization... and mindset... that perpetrated those attacks. Read Osama Bin Laden's open message to us... "Useful Idiot" describes people like you.

What's worse, like an idiot that eats propaganda for breakfast, you spewed that nonsense on Demand Studios Sucks.

Second, you've got no leg to stand on, speaking for "God-fearing people" if you people consistently contradict many lessons from the Bible. If you, or the other retards that attacked me, were God fearing, you wouldn't be saying 99.99% of the crap you say about me... or about other writers that are resistant to your bullying efforts.

Third, I posted only a few days in 2013 as of these series of posts. You miss your mark even with your own fantasy of what you're doing.

Fourth, it doesn't take me long to generate these replies. Again, speech-to-text is a valuable tool, and generating posts simply by dictating is a lot quicker than typing them in. I'm also a speed typist.

Like most of what you say, your assumptions, about the time I spend on the computer hammering you guys here, are wrong. 

DSS Zombie Squirrely Wrath Volunteers Free Writing Content to Demand Studios Sucks

"Granted, I'm not too familiar with this guy, as I tend to scurry up into a tree when a flamewar starts." -- squirrely_wrath

Yet, when caught in the flame war, fails to scurry up into a tree like he said he would. This person can't get his own actions straight. This calls the validity of his other statements into question.

    [quote] Postby squirrely_wrath » Fri Sep 13, 2013 11:47 am

I think I'll put that down on my resume as "Volunteer Work". We need to think of a formal award name for this to make it sound legit, though.[/quote]

The only "volunteer work" that I see you people doing is giving free content to the Demand Studios Sucks website. Fresh new posts/content helps a website out, and you guys... "professional" writers... are giving DSS content for free. If you want a formal award for the time you spend providing free content, talk to the Demand Studios Sucks administrators... it's their website that you're benefiting. 

Mathematically challenged CE ClueBat Assumes That I Spent the Whole Year on This Blog and on Reading Demand Studios Sucks

Math, in addition to Logic, destroys this DSS zombie's reasoning:

[quote]Postby CE_ClueLessBatS*t » Fri Sep 13, 2013 12:37 pm
lol "I save lives. I keep thebesig off the streets."[/quote]

"He's clearly an unhinged military dude with an M-16." -- Page 1 News

Actually, you save lives by staying indoors. Heaven forbid that you go outside and cause drivers to pay attention to you... out of morbid curiosity... and not to their driving. With you remaining indoors, these drivers won't get distracted and will focus on their driving.

As for "keeping me off the streets," what do you base that on?

Since I made those September 3, 2013 posts, I've done many things that involved being on the streets. One of them is making a long distance road trip. Another one involves 6 to 10 mile back pack weighted run days alternating with 2 mile swim days. Since September 3, I had spent a night in a haunted room, and have captured ghost activity in photos taken in that room... I wasn't actively being a ghost hunter.

I had to "be on the streets" to get there. Need I go on?

Since you people can't do math, and since you people are common sense challenged, you guys assumed that my posting a series of posts... all on September 3, with the previous series taking place in July 29... constituted my spending a lot of time on the computer simply addressing you idiots.

I swear; you people's action builds on my suspicion that you people's sole purposes in life is to serve as oxygen converters. If you guys got any dumber, you guys would start photosynthesizing.